<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
    <title>Charity Navigator: Top Ten Lists</title>
    <link>http://www.charitynavigator.org</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;At Charity Navigator, we recognize that charity evaluation may not be the most scintillating of topics for most observers.  That said, we are constantly searching for ways to help givers navigate a crowded marketplace, and to make this often-complex subject a tad more interesting. In the following Top 10 Lists, we identify those charities in our database that meet certain desirable or undesirable patterns of performance. As with all of our ratings of charities, the inclusion of each charity in this list is based entirely on whether or not it matched the criteria we defined for the list. In other words, we included charities based on how they performed financially, not on our subjective opinions of those charities.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
<item>
	<title>10 Most Requested Charities</title>
	<description>Since Charity Navigator launched its service in 2002, we have received thousands of requests from donors and charities to rate the financial performance of specific organizations. Users of our service are especially eager to see ratings for these ten most requested charities. The list is ranked by the number of times we have received a request to rate the charity.</description>
	<link>http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=topten.detail&amp;listid=103</link>
	<pubDate>Nov 21, 2009 EST</pubDate>
	<author>Charity Navigator</author>
</item>
<item>
	<title>10 Charities with the Most Consecutive 4-Star Ratings</title>
	<description>Charities tackle some of society’s most complex and intractable issues --- such as combating hunger, preserving the environment, curing diseases and changing people’s perceptions. These are long-term objectives. To be successful, organizations must be high performers consistently, year after year. These ten charities are the first to earn 8 consecutive 4-star ratings demonstrating an ongoing fiscal excellence. They are well-positioned to pursue and achieve long-term change.</description>
	<link>http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=topten.detail&amp;listid=100</link>
	<pubDate>Nov 21, 2009 EST</pubDate>
	<author>Charity Navigator</author>
</item>
<item>
	<title>10 Super-Sized Charities</title>
	<description>This Top 10 list contains some heavy hitters in the nonprofit sector. Each of these charities had total expenses greater than $500 million in its most recent fiscal year. Their combined total expenses are approximately $10 billion. We offer this list because we believe it is enlightening for donors to realize just how large many of America&apos;s charities are and why we believe it is important that our country establish a federal regulatory agency to monitor and regulate charities.</description>
	<link>http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=topten.detail&amp;listid=24</link>
	<pubDate>Nov 21, 2009 EST</pubDate>
	<author>Charity Navigator</author>
</item>
<item>
	<title>10 Slam-Dunk Charities</title>
	<description>These 10 charities are not only tops in terms of fiscal health, but also for respecting the rights of donors. Charity Navigator has awarded each of these 10 charities a 4-star rating for both organizational efficiency and organizational capacity. Besides outperforming its peers in terms of financial management, each of these charities also has a donor privacy policy in place. This tells us that these 10 charities are committed to fiscal responsibility and to protecting the personal information of contributors.</description>
	<link>http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=topten.detail&amp;listid=23</link>
	<pubDate>Nov 21, 2009 EST</pubDate>
	<author>Charity Navigator</author>
</item>
<item>
	<title>10 Celebrity-Related Charities</title>
	<description>Celebrity endorsements help charities increase awareness of their endeavors and thus stimulate more donations. However, just because your favorite super-star supports a charity doesn&apos;t mean the charity is well-run and worthy of a contribution from you. Check out how we rate these 10 charities which are closely aligned, in some cases even named for, the celebrities that founded or support them.</description>
	<link>http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=topten.detail&amp;listid=22</link>
	<pubDate>Nov 21, 2009 EST</pubDate>
	<author>Charity Navigator</author>
</item>
<item>
	<title>10 Charities Drowning in Administrative Costs</title>
	<description>These 10 charities are not models of efficiency. Each directs more than 48% of its budget towards administrative costs. That means most of your money goes toward such expenses as liability insurance, accounting and legal services, administrative salaries, and investment expenses, not the programs you aim to support.</description>
	<link>http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=topten.detail&amp;listid=20</link>
	<pubDate>Nov 21, 2009 EST</pubDate>
	<author>Charity Navigator</author>
</item>
<item>
	<title>10 of the Best Charities Everyone&apos;s Heard Of</title>
	<description>These 10 charities work throughout the country and the world. They are large, complex organizations with budgets exceeding $100 million, and at least $65 million in net assets. They became household names in part because of their exceptional financial management, no easy feat considering the scope and size of their operations. Charitable givers should feel confident that these national institutions put their donations to good use.</description>
	<link>http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=topten.detail&amp;listid=18</link>
	<pubDate>Nov 21, 2009 EST</pubDate>
	<author>Charity Navigator</author>
</item>
<item>
	<title>10 Most Frequently Reviewed Charities</title>
	<description>Popularity doesn&apos;t make a charity more effective or more worthy of support. But it does show that people know your name. These 10 charities are the most frequently visited on our web site. They are &lt;b&gt;ranked by number of page views during the month of September  2009&lt;/b&gt;.</description>
	<link>http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=topten.detail&amp;listid=15</link>
	<pubDate>Nov 21, 2009 EST</pubDate>
	<author>Charity Navigator</author>
</item>
<item>
	<title>10 Charities Worth Watching</title>
	<description>Many of America&apos;s most effective charities are also household names.  But some well-known charities are less effective than you&apos;d think, while a number of lesser known charities are truly exceptional.  These 10 charities all &lt;b&gt;operate on less than $2 million a year&lt;/b&gt;, but they all earn a four-star rating from Charity Navigator.  We encourage you to learn more about them.</description>
	<link>http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=topten.detail&amp;listid=7</link>
	<pubDate>Nov 21, 2009 EST</pubDate>
	<author>Charity Navigator</author>
</item>
<item>
	<title>10 Highly Paid CEOs at Low-Rated Charities</title>
	<description>For charities to be successful, they need talented, experienced leaders. Those leaders command significant salaries. But CEOs who command high salaries should also get the most out of the organizations they lead. The leaders of these 10 organizations are taking high salaries at the expense of spending dollars on the charity&apos;s programs. Despite receiving more than $240,000 in annual pay, these CEOs run organizations that devote &lt;b&gt;less than 60% of their budgets to their programs and services&lt;/b&gt;. That means that at least 40% of your dollars are going to such costs as fundraising and administration, including the salary of the CEO.</description>
	<link>http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=topten.detail&amp;listid=8</link>
	<pubDate>Nov 21, 2009 EST</pubDate>
	<author>Charity Navigator</author>
</item>
<item>
	<title>10 Inefficient Fundraisers</title>
	<description>Excellent charities succeed because their resources are not tied up in fundraising.  They find creative ways to spend less to raise more, thereby maximizing the resources they can devote to their programs.  These 10 charities are not so fortunate or efficient.  They spend more than $0.50 to raise each dollar in support, making them four times less efficient than the average charity.  This inefficiency forces them to &lt;b&gt;devote more than 40% of their budgets to fundraising&lt;/b&gt;, limiting the difference they can make with your dollars.</description>
	<link>http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=topten.detail&amp;listid=10</link>
	<pubDate>Nov 21, 2009 EST</pubDate>
	<author>Charity Navigator</author>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

