Review Before Proceeding
Impact & Measurement
Accountability & Finance
Culture & Community
Leadership & Adaptability
Veteran Sisters
MENIFEE CA | IRS ruling year: 2018 | EIN: 82-3755254 
An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.
An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.Organization Mission
To support and advocate for the unique needs of Women Veterans and all Military Sexual Trauma (MST) survivors. Rating Information
Not currently rated
Ratings are calculated from one or more beacon scores. Currently, we require either an Accountability & Finance beacon or an Impact & Measurement beacon to be eligible for a Charity Navigator rating. Note: The absence of a rating does not indicate a positive or negative assessment; it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated this organization.
See rating report below to learn why this organization is not currently eligible.
Historical Ratings 
Historical Ratings 
Charity Navigator's ratings previously did not consider Leadership & Adaptability, Culture & Community, or Impact & Measurement. The historic rating mainly reflects a version of today’s Accountability and Finance score. More information on our previous rating methodologies can be found on our rating methodology page.
Rating histories are available for a growing number of rated organizations. Check back later to see if this organization has a rating history!
Review Before Proceeding - Confirmed DelinquencyThis organization appears on the most recent listing of nonprofits that are delinquent with California state registrations
For more information about our alerts methodology, see here.
Rating Report
Accountability & Finance
Not Currently Scored
Unknown Reason
Charity Navigator is unable to evaluate this nonprofit at this time. Please see our Encompass Rating methodology for more information.
Additional Information
Total Revenue and Expenses - No Data Available
Total Revenue and Expenses - No Data Available
No Data Available
Revenue and expense data is not available for this organization. This data is only available if this organization has at least one year of electronically-filed Form 990 data filed within the last $six years.
Salary of Key Persons - No Data Available
Salary of Key Persons - No Data Available
No Data Available
Salary of Key Persons data is currently unavailable for this organization. This data is only available if this charity has at least one year of electronically-filed Form 990 data filed within the last 3 years. In some cases, there may be an electronically-filed 990 on file but the nonprofit may have not included the information and therefore we cannot post it.
IRS Published Data (Business Master File) - Data Available
IRS Published Data (Business Master File) - Data Available
Below are some key data points from the Exempt Organization IRS Business Master File (BMF) for this organization. Learn more about the BMF on the IRS website
Foundation Status:
Organization that normally receives no more than one-third of its support from gross investment income and unrelated business income and at the same time more than one-third of its support from contributions, fees, and gross receipts related to exempt purposes. 509(a)(2) (BMF foundation code: 16)
Affiliation:
Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary (i.e., not affiliated with a National, Regional, or Geographic grouping of organizations). (BMF affiliation code: 3)
Data Sources (IRS Forms 990) - Data Available
Data Sources (IRS Forms 990) - Data Available
The Form 990 is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage accountability and finance data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to search for this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website (if any are available). Simply enter the organization's name (Veteran Sisters) or EIN (823755254) in the 'Search Term' field.
Impact & Measurement
Not Currently Scored
Veteran Sisters cannot currently be evaluated by our Impact & Measurement methodology because either (A) it is eligible, but we have not yet received data; (B) we have not yet developed an algorithm to estimate its programmatic impact; (C) its programs are not direct services; or (D) it is not heavily reliant on contributions from individual donors.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
Culture & Community
Score
91
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's culture and connectedness to the community it serves.
Metrics
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No CreditConstituent Feedback - Data Available100/100 points
Constituent Feedback - Data Available100/100 points
33.33% of beacon score
This organization reported that it is collecting feedback from the constituents and/or communities it serves. The methodology leveraged for Constituent Feedback is based on The Core Principles of Constituent Feedback, which describes listening and responding well to feedback. Charity Navigator participates in a consortium with other feedback experts and leading nonprofit infrastructure platforms to drive Constituent Feedback's advancement, promotion, and data collection.
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
What challenges does your organization face in collecting feedback from the people you serve?
We don't have any major challenges to collecting feedback
Equity Practices - Data Available87/100 points
Equity Practices - Data Available87/100 points
66.67% of beacon score
This organization's score of 87 is a passing score. The organization reported that it is implementing 8 Equity Practices.
The Equity Strategies Checklist, developed by Equity in the Center, consists of practices and policies that promote racial equity in operations and programs. This data is collected in partnership with Candid.
| Equity Practices (3/7) | |
We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race. | |
We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and/or portfolios. | |
We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization/'s programs, portfolios, and the populations served. | |
We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support. | |
We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders. | |
We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured | |
We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization. | |
| Equity Policies and Procedures (5/7) | |
We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity. | |
We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions. | |
We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization. | |
We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board. | |
We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability. | |
We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team. | |
We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization. | |
Leadership & Adaptability
Score
100
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's leadership capacity, strategic thinking and planning, and ability to innovate or respond to changes in constituent demand/need or other relevant social and economic conditions to achieve the organization's mission.
- Strategic Partnerships
- Networks of Collective Impact Efforts
- Thought Leadership
- Raising Awareness
- Community Building
- Policy Advocacy
Metrics
Full CreditPartial CreditNo CreditMission 10/10 points
Mission 10/10 points
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's mission
Note: The organization did not respond to this question.
Vision 10/10 points
Vision 10/10 points
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization’s vision.
Note: The organization did not respond to this question.
Source: Nonprofit submitted responses
Goals 20/20 points
Goals 20/20 points
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking and goal setting through sharing their most important strategic goals.
Goal One: Enhance Organizational Capacity and Infrastructure: formalizing roles, establishing a sustainable financial model, and developing a solid governance framework to support our growth.
Goal Type: Invest in the capacity of our organization (financial, management, technical, etc.).
Goal Two: Expand MST Advocacy: raising public awareness and legislative engagement by leveraging our niche expertise and dedicated team to drive significant systemic change and enhance support for MST survivors
Goal Type: This goal reflects our commitment to further our advocacy work for our organization and or cause area.
Goal Three: Enhance and Scale Survivor Support: Establish emergency housing, develop resource centers, and provide tailored trauma care for MST survivors.
Goal Type: Grow, expand, scale or increase access to the existing programs and services.
Leadership Development 15/15 points
Leadership Development 15/15 points
The nonprofit provides evidence of investment in leadership development
Describe an investment in leadership
We invest in leadership development by funding educational programs and specialized training for our Executive Director and team members.
Mobilizing for Mission 15/15 points
Mobilizing for Mission 15/15 points
The nonprofit provides evidence of leadership through focusing externally and mobilizing resources for the mission.
This organization mobilizes for mission in the following ways:
What are this organization’s external mobilizaton efforts?
Partnerships with other nonprofit and public sector organizations. This includes collaborating with veteran service organizations and healthcare providers to enhance our support for MST survivors. Networks and collective impact efforts, working alongside multiple organizations to develop shared goals, particularly in advocating for policy changes and improved veteran services. Leadership regularly engages in thought leadership activities, such as presenting at conferences & seminars. Utilize marketing activities and social media platforms to raise awareness of our mission and the needs of MST survivors. Our campaigns are designed to educate the public and garner support for our cause. Involved in community building, offering training and organizing events that educate and empower MST survivors and the community at large. Team participates in local, state, and federal policy advocacy, working to influence policies and legislation that impact MST survivors and veterans.
Adaptability Story 30/30 points
Adaptability Story 30/30 points
The nonprofit has an opportunity to tell the story of how the organization adapted to tremendous external changes in the last year.
Organizational Restructuring: We evolved from a volunteer-based group to a structured nonprofit, formalizing roles and enhancing governance for improved efficiency and sustainability.
Service Expansion: Responding to increased needs, we introduced emergency housing and whole-person trauma treatment programs, necessitating new partnerships and funding sources.
Digital Strategy Revamp: To better connect with survivors, donors, and the public, we overhauled our online presence, enhancing engagement and communication.
Intensified Advocacy: Adapting to the evolving political and social landscape, we amplified our advocacy, engaging more deeply in policy-making and raising public awareness about MST.
These changes, driven by both internal insights and external pressures, have strengthened our capacity to support MST survivors and advocate for their needs effectively