BALLWIN MO | IRS ruling year: 2013 | EIN: 45-4807268
An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.
An EIN is a unique nine-digit number that identifies a business for tax purposes.
Rating Information
Not currently rated
Ratings are calculated from one or more beacon scores. Currently, we require either an Accountability & Finance beacon or an Impact assessment to be eligible for a Charity Navigator rating. Note: The absence of a rating does not indicate a positive or negative assessment; it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated this organization.
See rating report below to learn why this organization is not currently eligible.
Historical Ratings
Charity Navigator's ratings previously did not consider Leadership & Adaptability, Culture & Community, or Impact & Measurement. The historic rating mainly reflects a version of today’s Accountability and Finance score. More information on our previous rating methodologies can be found on our rating methodology page.
Rating histories are available for a growing number of rated organizations. Check back later to see if this organization has a rating history!
Lighting the Path Enterprises cannot currently be evaluated by our Accountability & Finance methodology due to only having 3 years of electronically-filed IRS Form 990 data (990EZ, 990N, 990PF does not qualify).
To ensure year-to-year consistency the Encompass Rating System's Accountability & Finance beacon analyzes the three-year average of some data provided through the IRS form 990.
Charity Navigator currently only has 3 years of consecutive e-filed Forms 990 from the IRS for Lighting the Path Enterprises under the EIN: 45-4807268.
Before Charity Navigator can evaluate Lighting the Path Enterprises, Lighting the Path Enterprises will need to e-file for additional fiscal years.
This chart displays the trend of revenue and expenses over the past several years for this organization, as reported on their IRS Form 990.
Click or hover over the bar to see exact $ amount
Salary of Key Persons - Data Available
The compensation data below shows the five highest paid individuals at this charity. The amount includes salary, cash bonuses, and compensation from related organizations. The amounts do not include nontaxable benefits, deferred compensation, or other amounts not reported on Form W-2.
Dawn Malcolm, Director
$0
Karen Robinson Morre, Grant Researcher
$0
Rebecca Jo Shepherd, Treasurer
$0
Susan Schlueter, Vocational Specialist
$0
Barb Ruiz, Secretary
$0
Source: IRS Form 990 (page 7), filing year 2021
IRS Published Data (Business Master File) - Data Available
Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (BMF foundation code: 15)
Affiliation:
Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary (i.e., not affiliated with a National, Regional, or Geographic grouping of organizations). (BMF affiliation code: 3)
Data Sources (IRS Forms 990) - Data Available
The Form 990 is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage accountability and finance data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to search for this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website (if any are available). Simply enter the organization's name (Lighting the Path Enterprises) or EIN (454807268) in the 'Search Term' field.
Impact & Measurement
Score
74
This beacon estimates the actual impact a charity has on the lives of those it serves, and determines whether it is making good use of donor resources to achieve that impact.
The Measuring Outcomes assessment evaluates how well a charity tracks progress towards its mission's outcomes.
Displayed below are the responses provided by the charity for the Measuring Outcomes assessment. Each question is designed to address specific criteria, with responses eligible for full, partial, or no credit. Please refer to the scoring rubric for details on how responses are scored.
Selected program: Vocational Residential Girls School in Burkina Faso, West Africa, Submitted March 2025
Program Planning and Design
17 out of 27 points
This section assesses the use of crucial evaluation tools in program objective-setting and activities.
Charity leadership uses information collected to make decisions regarding programs
Agree, uses information collected to improve programs
Charity staff have training or experience in monitoring and evaluation
Partially agree, staff are trained in monitoring and evaluation practices
Charity has staff responsible for collecting information and measuring program progress
Agree, has dedicated team or department
Charity has documents and reviews how program activities lead to change
Disagree, does not document or review
Charity has researched program model before implementation in the following ways
Did not research program model before implementation
Charity revisits how program activities lead to change
Disagree, does not revisit how program activities lead to change
Charity tracks program progress in the following ways
Tracks activities
Tracks outcomes and impacts
Tracks using timelines and milestones
Aligns plan with mission
Program Development
27 out of 27 points
This section assesses the consideration of stakeholders in program objectives and activities.
Charity identifies program target population needs in the following ways
Conducted a needs assessment
Conducted a baseline assessment
Charity considers practical, cultural, and political needs and interests of those served by program
Agree, charity is responsive to practical, cultural, and political needs
Charity reviews the work whether similar organizations work on the same problem
Agree, reviews the work of similar organizations
Charity uses SMART Goals
Agree, identified Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound (SMART) goals
Data Collection and Analysis
9 out of 18 points
This section assesses the best practices used in collecting and analyzing program data.
Charity tracks program information in the following ways
Collects data during program implementation
Collects data when a program is complete
Charity collects programmatic information on those served by the program in the following ways
Collects demographic data of those served by program
Collects information about the quality of service from the target population
Charity collects and analyzes program information to determine results in the following ways
Compares effect of program on target population and those not served by program
Conducts data analysis over multiple points in time to measure change over time
Reporting and Distribution of Results
12 out of 18 points
This section assesses reporting and disseminating program results.
Charity reports program results to key stakeholders
Staff and volunteers
Board members
Charity reports both favorable and unfavorable results
Yes, charity reports both favorable of unfavorable results
Use of Results
7 out of 9 points
This section assesses the use of results to guide learning.
Charity uses program results to inform future work for the following reasons
Sustain and secure funding
Improve program operations
Understand the impact of their work
Inform how we create future programs
Culture & Community
Not Currently Scored
Lighting the Path Enterprises cannot currently be evaluated by our Culture & Community methodology because we have not received data from the charity regarding its Constituent Feedback.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's leadership capacity, strategic thinking and planning, and ability to innovate or respond to changes in constituent demand/need or other relevant social and economic conditions to achieve the organization's mission.
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's mission.
Lighting the path's mission is to alleviate poverty by developing and implementing empowerment programs. We are offering marginalized populations an education, training, skills and supplies to start their own small business and earn an income to improve their own standard of living.
Vision Statement
10 out of 10 points
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's vision.
Our vision is to empower people and see them flourish and live out their full, God-given potential a
Strategic Goals
20 out of 20 points
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking and goal setting through sharing their most important strategic goals.
Goal One: Empowering those living in poverty with self esteem, skills, education and support to build self reliance and improve their own lives.
Goal Two: We are looking to expand our services to regional marginalized populations. We are working on implementing programs to serve refugees, immigrants and any marginalized people in our area.
Goal Three: We have completed our school building in West Africa and are preparing to start technical classes for young women and girls which will give them skills to support themselves and their families
Leadership
30 out of 30 points
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
Investment in Leadership Development
15 out of 15 points
The nonprofit provides evidence of investment in leadership development.
The leadership has attended virtual conferences and masterclasses to develop strategies and better understand the changing ways of offering services this year, especially due to covid and the adaptations needing to be made to continue working with those we are trying to serve.
External Focus on Mobilizing Mission
15 out of 15 points
The nonprofit provides evidence of leadership through focusing externally and mobilizing resources for the mission.
Strategic Partnerships
Social Promotion
Civic Engagement
Adaptability
30 out of 30 points
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
Adaptability Practices
30 out of 30 points
The nonprofit has an opportunity to tell the story of how the organization adapted to tremendous external changes in the last year
We began utilizing more virtual communication. Since we were unable to hold classes or group events, we began using a one on one mentorship model to offer our services. This was trial and error and we continued to work on how to adapt and change our efforts to an online platform which we will continue to perfect and modify until it is working well and providing what is needed. We developed a system to contact and stay in communication with our international workers on the ground in West Africa. This is a challenge which we do not have control over, but must find a way to navigate what is in place at this time and we were successful at doing this.