Bulamu International
Bulamu International
Palo Alto CA | IRS ruling year: 2016 | EIN: 47-4196766
Organization Mission
We treat the sick and strengthen health systems serving Africans most in need.
Your donation attempt encountered a problem. Please refresh the page to try again.
You're faster than our page! Give the page a little longer to finish loading and try your donation again.
Palo Alto CA | IRS ruling year: 2016 | EIN: 47-4196766
Organization Mission
We treat the sick and strengthen health systems serving Africans most in need.
Great
This charity's score is 92%, earning it a Four-Star rating. If this organization aligns with your passions and values, you can give with confidence.
This overall score is calculated from multiple beacon scores, weighted as follows: 80% Accountability & Finance, 10% Leadership & Adaptability, 10% Culture & Community. Learn more about our criteria and methodology.
We recognize that not all metrics and beacons equally predict a charity’s success. The percentage each beacon contributes to the organization’s overall rating depends on the number of beacons an organization has earned.
Use the tool below to select different beacons to see how the weighting shifts when only one, two, or three beacons are earned.
Charity Navigator's ratings previously did not consider Leadership & Adaptability, Culture & Community, or Impact & Results. The historic rating mainly reflects a version of today’s Accountability and Finance score. More information on our previous rating methodologies can be found on our rating methodology page.
Rating histories are available for a growing number of rated organizations. Check back later to see if this organization has a rating history!
Score
Most Recent Fiscal Year:
FY 2022
This beacon provides an assessment of a charity's financial health (financial efficiency, sustainability, and trustworthiness) and its commitment to governance practices and policies.
Learn more
Industry professionals strongly recommend an independent governing body to allow for full deliberation and diversity of thinking on governance and other organizational matters. We check to see that a majority of board members are identified as independent on their tax form.
Source: IRS Form 990
Industry professionals strongly recommend an independent governing body to allow for full deliberation and diversity of thinking on governance and other organizational matters. For most organizations, we check to see if the organization has at least three independent board members. For large, donor-funded organizations, we check to see if the organization has at least five independent board members
Source: IRS Form 990
An Audit, Review, or Compilation provides important information about financial accountability and accuracy. Organizations are scored based on their Total Revenue Amount:
Total Revenue Amount | Expectation to Receive Credit |
$2 million or higher and 40% or higher donor support | Expected to complete an audit and have an audit oversight committee |
$1 million or higher | Expected to complete an audit |
$500,000 - $1 million | Expected to complete an audit, review, or compilation |
Less than $500,000 | No expectation (removed from scoring methodology) |
Source: IRS Form 990
A diversion of assets — any unauthorized conversion or use of the organization's assets other than for the organization's authorized purposes, including but not limited to embezzlement or theft — also can seriously call into question a charity's financial integrity. We review the charity's most recent IRS Form 990 to see if the charity has reported any diversion of assets.
Source: IRS Form 990
Charity Navigator looks for a website on the IRS Form 990 as an accountability and transparency metric.
Nonprofits act in the public trust and reporting publicly on activities is an important component.
Source: IRS Form 990
Charity Navigator looks for the existence of a conflict of interest policy on the IRS Form 990 as an accountability and transparency measure.
This policy protects the organization and by extension those it serves, when it is considering entering into a transaction that may benefit the private interest of an officer, director and/or key employee of the organization.
Source: IRS Form 990
Charity Navigator looks for the existence of a whistleblower policy per the IRS Form 990 as an accountability and transparency measure.
This policy outlines procedures for handling employee complaints, as well as a confidential way for employees to report financial or other types of mismanagement.
Source: IRS Form 990
Charity Navigator looks for the existence of a document retention and destruction policy per the IRS Form 990 as an accountability and transparency measure.
This policy establishes guidelines for the handling, backing up, archiving and destruction of documents. These guidelines foster good record keeping procedures that promote data integrity.
Source: IRS Form 990
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the IRS Form 990 that the organization has this process in place as an accountability and transparency measure.
An official record of the events that take place during a board meeting ensures that a contemporaneous document exists for future reference.
Source: IRS Form 990
For almost all charities, we check the charity's IRS Form 990 to see if it discloses that the Form 990 is available on the charity's website. As with the audited financial statement, donors need easy access to this financial report to help determine if the organization is managing its financial resources well.
Source: IRS Form 990
The Liabilities to Assets Ratio is determined by Total Liabilities divided by Total Assets (most recent IRS Form 990). This ratio is an indicator of an organization's solvency and/or long-term sustainability.
Source: IRS Form 990
The Program Expense Ratio is determined by Program Expenses divided by Total Expense (average of most recent three IRS Forms 990). This measure reflects the percent of its total expenses a charity spends on the programs and services it exists to deliver.
Source: IRS Form 990
This chart displays the trend of revenue and expenses over the past several years for this organization, as reported on their IRS Form 990.
Presented here are up to five of this organization's highest compensated employees. This compensation data includes salary, cash bonuses, and expense accounts and is displayed exactly how it is reported to the IRS. The amounts do not include nontaxable benefits, deferred compensation, or other amounts not reported on Form W-2. In some cases, these amounts may include compensation from related organizations. Read the IRS policies for compensation reporting
Richard Siegler, President And Ceo
$95,000
Patrick Kyamanywa Md, Board Member
Compensation not entered
Chuck Sheldon, Board Member
Compensation not entered
Elena Patterson, Board Member
Compensation not entered
Richard Chandler, Executive Chair
Compensation not entered
Source: IRS Form 990 (page 7), filing year 2022
Below are some key data points from the Exempt Organization IRS Business Master File (BMF) for this organization. Learn more about the BMF on the IRS website
Foundation Status:
Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (BMF foundation code: 15)
Affiliation:
Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary (i.e., not affiliated with a National, Regional, or Geographic grouping of organizations). (BMF affiliation code: 3)
The Form 990 is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage finance and accountability data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to search for this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website (if any are available). Simply enter the organization's name (Bulamu International) or EIN (474196766) in the 'Search Term' field.
Not Currently Scored
Bulamu International cannot currently be evaluated by our Impact & Results methodology because either (A) it is eligible, but we have not yet received data; (B) we have not yet developed an algorithm to estimate its programmatic impact; (C) its programs are not direct services; or (D) it is not heavily reliant on contributions from individual donors.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
Score
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's culture and connectedness to the community it serves.
Learn more
30% of beacon score
This organization reported that it is collecting feedback from the constituents and/or communities it serves. The methodology leveraged for Constituent Feedback is based on The Core Principles of Constituent Feedback, which describes listening and responding well to feedback. Charity Navigator participates in a consortium with other feedback experts and leading nonprofit infrastructure platforms to drive Constituent Feedback's advancement, promotion, and data collection.
How is your organization using feedback from the people you serve?
To identify and remedy poor client service experiences, To identify bright spots and enhance positive service experiences, To make fundamental changes to our programs and/or operations, To inform the development of new programs/projects, To identify where we are less inclusive or equitable across demographic groups, To strengthen relationships with the people we serve
What challenges does your organization face in collecting feedback from the people you serve?
It is difficult to find the ongoing funding to support feedback collection
70% of beacon score
This organization's score of 87 is a passing score. The organization reported that it is implementing 8 Equity Practices.
This assessment demonstrates the importance of implementing practices that contribute positively to an organization's overall culture, both internally and with respect to community engagement. Furthermore, equity centered frameworks and similar approaches have drawn much attention from donors, experts, and sector leaders who underscore its value to the nonprofit's overall health and capacity for mission success. Currently, the Equity Strategies Checklist assessment consists of practices and policies that promote racial equity in their operations and programs (per the Equity Strategies checklist administered by Candid). As we refine our DEI assessment, Charity Navigator partners with DEI consultants and field experts to broaden and deepen this work.
Equity Practices (3/7) | |
We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race. | |
We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and/or portfolios. | |
We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization/'s programs, portfolios, and the populations served. | |
We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support. | |
We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders. | |
We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured | |
We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization. |
Equity Policies and Procedures (5/7) | |
We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity. | |
We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions. | |
We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization. | |
We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board. | |
We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability. | |
We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team. | |
We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization. |
Score
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's leadership capacity, strategic thinking and planning, and ability to innovate or respond to changes in constituent demand/need or other relevant social and economic conditions to achieve the organization's mission.
Learn more
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's mission
We treat the sick and strengthen health systems serving Africans most in need.
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization’s vision.
Improve healthcare for the poor by bringing upgraded clinical processes, cost-effective technology s
Source: Nonprofit submitted responses
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking and goal setting through sharing their most important strategic goals.
Goal One: Improve the standard of care in general medicine at public facilities by providing resources and training for improved productivity, so that more patients can be treated with existing resources
Goal Type: Grow, expand, scale or increase access to the existing programs and services.
Goal Two: Offer free “Surgery Intensives” that concentrate local resources at existing public facilities for weeklong events that attract patients from long distances and clear the backlog of untreated cases
Goal Type: Grow, expand, scale or increase access to the existing programs and services.
Goal Three: Install the Health Center Excellence management system in public health facilities and issuing weekly/monthly reports to improve patient care, staff attendance and clinician productivity.
Goal Type: Grow, expand, scale or increase access to the existing programs and services.
The nonprofit provides evidence of investment in leadership development
Describe an investment in leadership
Local Staff Education: Through our CST program, we assign 3-5 licensed Ugandan clinicians to work for 8 weeks with local staff at the district’s four largest health centers, modeling a higher-productivity and more professional culture. Health Facility Management Training: When introducing our HCE management system, we use a “train the trainer” approach to teach the health leaders how to operate it. Each facility is provided with a program manual and the related materials which provide instructions on how to use the devices and reports being provided. Staff members are trained in management disciplines using the new data. MBA Mini-Course: This year we inaugurated a 3-day Leadership Skills Seminar for the District Health Officers and Biostatisticians at our 11 partner districts, utilizing curriculum materials our Executive Board Chair Richard Chandler has used in his 18 years as an MBA professor at the University of California, Irvine.
The nonprofit provides evidence of leadership through focusing externally and mobilizing resources for the mission.
This organization mobilizes for mission in the following ways:
Strategic Partnerships
Networks of Collective Impact Efforts
Raising Awareness
Community Building
Policy Advocacy
What are this organization’s external mobilizaton efforts?
In meetings with Uganda’s senior Ministry of Health leaders over the last 5 years, we have explained our programs, provided Monitoring & Evaluation reports on their effectiveness, and won their overall support for our strategic directions. We received a letter from the MOH Permanent Secretary in June 2021 addressed to all district officials and addressing our management system as a “demonstration project” for possible inclusion into its standard operating model for health centers. On the local level, we now have signed MOUs with 11 district governments that have already hosted one or more programs. Each of these MOUs required presentations to local leaders at district Stakeholders Meetings. Altogether these districts operate 315 public hospitals and clinics that treat 3.2 million patients per year, representing 10% of all the government facilities in Uganda. We also engage the public by maintaining a vibrant website and post regular updates on social media channels.
The nonprofit has an opportunity to tell the story of how the organization adapted to tremendous external changes in the last year.
Between April 2016 and February 2020, Bulamu operated 17 weeklong medical camps that treated 154,690 patients free-of-charge—and then the world changed. Uganda imposed a total lockdown between March and June of 2020, with all inter-city travel suspended. Medical camps were banned as potential super-spreader events, but there were no restrictions on our sending Bulamu clinicians to existing MOH facilities, which were continuing to treat ill patients. In June 2020, once travel was permitted again, we launched a new initiative focused on strengthening the existing public health system by combining three linked programs: Clinical Support Teams (CST), Surgery Intensives (SI), and the Bulamu HCE Program. This new strategy, which has been enthusiastically received by government officials, is now improving the health system faster, with greater long-term results, than our pre-pandemic medical camp model. With the CST, we are providing free general medicine treatment to 50-60,000 patients a year for a cost of under $5 per patient. This lays the groundwork for our SI program and HCE programs, which perform surgeries and impact patient care at the 315 health units in our system. In 2021, we introduced into our programs a vertical focus on one clinical area where the need for innovative, cost-effective solutions was particularly apparent: Maternal & Child Health (MCH). Building on our established district partnerships, we raised the MCH Standard of Care with the presence of our Core Team of clinicians on-site, who brought needed skills and supplies. The HCE program added Emergency Transport, Essential Surgical Supplies, MCH patient forms and surgical equipment to its competencies. In 2021, our MCH programs helped 6,061 patients give birth safely, including 505 C-sections. We expect to add clinical training on vital MCH skills (e.g., Helping Babies Breathe for newborn resuscitation) in 2022.
Impact & Results
Accountability & Finance
Culture & Community
Leadership & Adaptability
The Giving Basket is having some issues. If you wish to donate, please refresh the page. If the problem persists contact us.
Cart ID: Not Assigned
The Giving Basket is having some issues. If you wish to donate, please refresh the page. If the problem persists contact us.
Cart ID: Not Assigned