Utah Symphony & Opera
Utah Symphony & Opera
Salt Lake Cty UT | IRS ruling year: 1975 | EIN: 51-0145980
The mission of the Utah Symphony & Opera is to give great performances which engage, educate, and enrich lives.
Your donation attempt encountered a problem. Please refresh the page to try again.
You're faster than our page! Give the page a little longer to finish loading and try your donation again.
Salt Lake Cty UT | IRS ruling year: 1975 | EIN: 51-0145980
The mission of the Utah Symphony & Opera is to give great performances which engage, educate, and enrich lives.
Great
This charity's score is 93%, earning it a Four-Star rating. If this organization aligns with your passions and values, you can give with confidence.
This overall score is calculated from multiple beacon scores: 90% Accountability & Finance, 10% Leadership & Adaptability. Learn more about our criteria and methodology.
We recognize that not all metrics and beacons equally predict a charity’s success. The percentage each beacon contributes to the organization’s overall rating depends on the number of beacons an organization has earned.
Use the tool below to select different beacons to see how the weighting shifts when only one, two, or three beacons are earned.
Date Published | Form 990 FYE | Overall Score | Overall Rating |
Rating Version: 2.1 | |||
4/1/2021 | 2019 | 92.07 | |
11/1/2019 | 2018 | 94.50 | |
12/1/2018 | 2017 | 91.95 | |
2/1/2018 | 2016 | 95.31 | |
2/1/2017 | 2015 | 93.87 | |
6/1/2016 | 2014 | 93.11 | |
Rating Version: 2.0 | |||
11/1/2015 | 2014 | 91.31 | |
3/1/2015 | 2013 | 91.08 | |
12/1/2013 | 2012 | 91.51 | |
11/6/2012 | 2011 | 91.48 | |
9/20/2011 | 2010 | 84.99 | |
Rating Version: 1.0 | |||
2/1/2011 | 2009 | 83.72 |
The IRS is significantly delayed in processing nonprofits' annual tax filings (Forms 990). As a result, the Accountability & Finance score for Utah Symphony & Opera is outdated and the overall rating may not be representative of its current operations. Please check with the charity directly for any questions you may have.
Utah Symphony & Opera has earned a 92% for the Accountability & Finance beacon. See the metrics below for more information.
This beacon provides an assessment of a charity's financial health (financial efficiency, sustainability, and trustworthiness) and its commitment to governance practices and policies.
This Accountability & Finance score represents IRS Form 990 data up until FY 2019, which is the most recent Form 990 currently available to us.
Learn more
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990 that the organization has these governance practices in place.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990
Independent Voting Board Members ... (More) The presence of an independent governing body is strongly recommended by many industry professionals to allow for full deliberation and diversity of thinking on governance and other organizational matters. Our analysts check the Form 990 to determine if the independent Board members are a voting majority and also at least five in number. (Less) | |
No Material Diversion of Assets ... (More) A diversion of assets – any unauthorized conversion or use of the organization's assets other than for the organization's authorized purposes, including but not limited to embezzlement or theft – can seriously call into question a charity's financial integrity. We check the charity's last two Forms 990 to see if the charity has reported any diversion of assets. If the charity does report a diversion, then we check to see if it complied with the Form 990 instructions by describing what happened and its corrective action. This metric will be assigned to one of the following categories:
| |
Audited Financials Prepared by Independent Accountant ... (More) Audited financial statements provide important information about financial accountability and accuracy. They should be prepared by an independent accountant with oversight from an audit committee. (It is not necessary that the audit committee be a separate committee. Often at smaller charities, it falls within the responsibilities of the finance committee or the executive committee.) The committee provides an important oversight layer between the management of the organization, which is responsible for the financial information reported, and the independent accountant, who reviews the financials and issues an opinion based on its findings. We check the charity's Form 990 reporting to see if it meets this criteria.
| |
Does Not Provide Loan(s) to or Receive Loan(s) From Related Parties ... (More) Making loans to related parties such as key officers, staff, or Board members, is not standard practice in the sector as it may divert the charity's funds away from its charitable mission and can lead to real and perceived conflict-of-interest problems. This practice is discouraged by sector trade groups which point to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when they call for charities to refrain from making loans to directors and executives. And the IRS is concerned enough with the practice that it requires charities to disclose on their Form 990 any loans to or from current and former officers, directors, trustees, key employees, and other "disqualified persons." Furthermore, some state laws go so far as to prohibit loans to board members and officers. And although employees and trustees are permitted to make loans to charities, this practice can also result in real and/or perceived conflict of interest problems for the charity. Furthermore, it is problematic because it is an indicator that the organization is not financially secure. (Less) | |
Documents Board Meeting Minutes ... (More) An official record of the events that take place during a board meeting ensures that a contemporaneous document exists for future reference. Charities are not required to make their Board meeting minutes available to the public. As such, we are not able to review and critique their minutes. For this performance metric, we are checking to see if the charity reports on its Form 990 that it does keep those minutes. In the future, we will also track and rate whether or not a charity keeps minutes for its committee meetings. (Less) | |
Distributes 990 to Board Before Filing ... (More) Providing copies of the Form to the governing body in advance of filing is considered a best practice, as it allows for thorough review by the individuals charged with overseeing the organization. The Form 990 asks the charity to disclose whether or not it has followed this best practice. If the charity has not distributed its Form 990 to the board before filing, then we deduct 4 points from its Accountability and Transparency score. (Less) | |
Does not Compensate Board Members ... (More) The IRS requires that any compensation paid to members of the charity's governing body be listed on the Form 990. Furthermore, all members of the governing body need to be listed whether or not they are compensated. It is not unusual for some members of the board to have compensation listed. The executive director of the organization frequently has a seat on the board, for instance, and is compensated for being a full time staff member. However, it is rare for a charity to compensate individuals only for serving on its Board of Directors. Although this sort of board compensation is not illegal, it is not considered a best practice. (Less) |
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990, or for some metrics on the charity's website, that the organization has these policies in place.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990 and organization's website
Conflict of Interest ... (More) Such a policy protects the organization, and by extension those it serves, when it is considering entering into a transaction that may benefit the private interest of an officer or director of the organization. Charities are not required to share their conflict of interest policies with the public. Although we can not evaluate the substance of its policy, we can tell you if the charity has one in place based on the information it reports on its Form 990. If the charity does not have a Conflict of Interest policy, then we deduct 4 points from its Accountability and Transparency score. (Less) | |
Whistleblower ... (More) This policy outlines procedures for handling employee complaints, as well as a confidential way for employees to report any financial mismanagement. Here we are reporting on the existence of a policy as reported by the charity on its Form 990. (Less) | |
Records Retention and Destruction ... (More) Such a policy establishes guidelines for handling, backing up, archiving and destruction of documents. These guidelines foster good record keeping procedures that promotes data integrity. Here we are reporting on the existence of a policy as reported by the charity on its Form 990. If the charity does not have a Records Retention and Destruction Policy, then we deduct 4 points from its Accountability and Transparency score. (Less) | |
CEO Compensation Process ... (More) This process indicates that the organization has a documented policy that it follows year after year. The policy should indicate that an objective and independent review process of the CEO's compensation has been conducted which includes benchmarking against comparable organizations. We check to be sure that the charity has reported on its Form 990 its process for determining its CEO pay. (Less) | |
Donor Privacy ... (More) Donors can be reluctant to contribute to a charity when their name, address, or other basic information may become part of donor lists that are exchanged or sold, resulting in an influx of charitable solicitations from other organizations. Our analysts check the charity's website to see if the organization has a donor privacy policy in place and what it does and does not cover. Privacy policies are assigned to one of the following categories:
The privacy policy must be specific to donor information. A general website policy which references "visitor" or "user" personal information will not suffice. A policy that refers to donor information collected on the website is also not sufficient as the policy must be comprehensive and applicable to both online and offline donors. The existence of a privacy policy of any type does not prohibit the charity itself from contacting the donor for informational, educational, or solicitation purposes. (Less) |
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990, or for some metrics on the charity's website, that the organization makes this information easily accessible.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990 and organization's website
CEO Salary Listed on 990 ... (More) Charities are required to list their CEO's name and compensation on the Form 990. Our analysts check to be sure that the charities complied with the Form 990 instructions and included this information in their filing. (Less) | |
Board of Directors Listed on Website ... (More) Our analysts check to see if the charity lists Board members on its website. Publishing this information enables donors and other stakeholders to ascertain the make up of the charity's governing body. This enables stakeholders to report concerns to the Board. Charity Navigator does not cross-check the Board members listed on the website with that reported on the Form 990, because the latter often isn't available until more than a year after the charity's fiscal year ends. In that time, the charity's Board members may have changed, and the charity typically reflects those more recent changes on the website. (Less) | |
Key Staff Listed on Website ... (More) It is important for donors and other stakeholders to know who runs the organization day-to-day. Charity Navigator does not cross-check the leadership listed on the website with that reported on the Form 990 because the latter often isn't available until more than a year after the charity's fiscal year ends. In that time, the charity's leadership may have changed and the charity typically reflects those more recent changes on the website. In other words, since the Form 990 isn't especially timely, it can not be used to verify the leadership information published on the charity's site. (Less) | |
Audited Financial Statements Listed on Website ... (More) We check the charity's website to see if it has published its audited financial statements for the fiscal year represented by the most recently filed IRS Form 990. It is important for donors to have easy access to this financial report to help determine if the organization is managing its financial resources well. We currently rate charities on whether or not they publish their audit on their website. (Less) | |
Form 990 Available on Website ... (More) We check the charity's website to see if it has published its most recently filed IRS Form 990 (a direct link to the charity's 990 on an external site is sufficient). It is important for donors to have easy access to this financial report to help determine if the organization is managing its financial resources well. (Less) |
The Liabilities to Assets Ratio is determined by Total Liabilities divided by Total Assets (most recent 990).
Part of our goal in rating the financial performance of charities is to help donors assess the financial capacity and sustainability of a charity. As do organizations in other sectors, charities must be mindful of their management of total liabilites in relation to their total assets. This ratio is an indicator of an organization’s solvency and or long term sustainability. Dividing a charity's total liabilities by its total assets yields this percentage.
Source: IRS Form 990
Determines how long a charity could sustain its level of spending using its net available assets, or working capital, as reported on its most recently filed Form 990. We include in a charity's working capital unrestricted and temporarily restricted net assets, and exclude permanently restricted net assets. Dividing these net available assets in the most recent year by a charity's average total expenses, yields the working capital ratio. We calculate the charity's average total expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
The amount spent to raise $1 in charitable contributions. To calculate a charity's fundraising efficiency, we divide its average fundraising expenses by the average total contributions it receives. We calculate the charity's average expenses and average contributions over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
As reported by charities on their IRS Form 990, this measure reflects what percent of its total budget a charity spends on overhead, administrative staff and associated costs, and organizational meetings. Dividing a charity's average administrative expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
This measure reflects what a charity spends to raise money. Fundraising expenses can include campaign printing, publicity, mailing, and staffing and costs incurred in soliciting donations, memberships, and grants. Dividing a charity's average fundraising expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
The Program Expense Ratio is determined by Program Expenses divided by Total Expense (average of most recent three 990s).
This measure reflects the percent of its total expenses a charity spends on the programs and services it exists to deliver. Dividing a charity's average program expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Organizations that demonstrate consistent annual growth in program expenses are able to outpace inflation and thus sustain their programs year to year. These organizations also supply givers with greater confidence by maintaining broad public support for their programs. We compute the average annual growth of program expenses using the following formula: [(Yn/Y0)(1/n)]-1, where Y0 is a charity's program expenses in the first year of the interval analyzed, Yn is the charity's program expenses in the most recent year, and n is the interval of years passed between Y0 and Yn.
Source: IRS Form 990
This chart displays the trend of revenue and expenses over the past several years for this organization, as reported on their IRS Form 990.
Presented here are this organizations key compensated staff members as identified by our analysts. This compensation data includes salary, cash bonuses and expense accounts and is displayed exactly how it is reported to the IRS. The amounts do not include nontaxable benefits, deferred compensation, or other amounts not reported on Form W-2. In some cases, these amounts may include compensation from related organizations. Read the IRS policies for compensation reporting
Paul Meecham, President & CEO
$309,746 (1.33% of Total Expenses)
Current CEO and Board Chair can be found in the Leadership & Adaptability report below.
Source: IRS Form 990 (page 7), filing year 2020
Below are some key data points from the Exempt Organization IRS Business Master File (BMF) for this organization. Learn more about the BMF on the IRS website
Activities:
Cultural performances (BMF activity code: 090)
Foundation Status:
Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (BMF foundation code: 15)
Affiliation:
Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary (i.e., not affiliated with a National, Regional, or Geographic grouping of organizations). (BMF affiliation code: 3)
The Form 990 is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage finance and accountability data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to search for this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website (if any are available). Simply enter the organization's name (Utah Symphony & Opera) or EIN (510145980) in the 'Search Term' field.
This organization was impacted by COVID-19 in a way that effected their financial health in 2020. This normally would have reduced their star rating. Due to the unprecedented nature of the pandemic, we give charities such as this one the opportunity to share the story of COVID's impact on them, and doing this pauses our revision of their rating. Charities may submit their own pandemic responses through their nonprofit portal.
Utah Symphony & Opera reported being impacted by COVID-19 in the following ways:
Program Delivery
Fundraising Capacity
Revenue
How COVID-19 impacted the organization's operations financially:
Earned revenue from ticket sales declined by close to 70% during the pandemic due to the inability to perform live performances. All Utah Symphony | Utah Opera performances were canceled during a six month period, and once we were able to resume live performances, audience capacity was limited to 15%. We were able to keep all of our staff fully employed thanks to PPP loans and generous public and private contributed support.
How COVID-19 impacted the organization's delivery of programs:
With the help of engineers, we devised a strict safety policy to provide the best protection for our musicians and singers once we were able to resume live performances. We adapted our repertoire to feature strings only, or small ensembles on stage, and minimal opera casts. We were able to explore and present more unusual repertoire. During a subsequent lock down of our facilities, we offered streamed programs, our musicians performed "Quarantunes from Home," and we made archival performances available on line. All of our education programs, usually presented in person and state-wide, became virtual
How this organization adapted to changing conditions caused by COVID-19:
For over a year, most employees worked remotely. Once we were able to gather in person again, we adhered closely to our safety plan for both front and back of house, and performed to minimal audiences. Thanks to the ability to offer streamed and virtual performances, we were able to reach different and more widely dispersed audiences all over the country and beyond. Artists were able to work one on one with individual students, and created new small ensembles that were able to perform in unique settings.
Innovations the organization intends to continue permanently after the pandemic:
The opportunity to reach more remote audiences without the usual access to our performance venues was a plus, and we plan to continue those practices that allow greater access to our programs. We learned that we can offer our education programs in a hybrid of both in person and virtual presentations. For example, our Utah Symphony 5th grade concerts presented live at Maurice Abravanel Hall, will also be recorded for viewing in schools too far away to attend in person. The technology upgrades and technical skills acquired during the pandemic will continue to serve us well.
Not Currently Scored
Utah Symphony & Opera cannot currently be evaluated by our Impact & Results methodology because either (A) it is eligible, but we have not yet received data; (B) we have not yet developed an algorithm to estimate its programmatic impact; (C) its programs are not direct services; or (D) it is not heavily reliant on contributions from individual donors.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
Learn More
Utah Symphony & Opera reported its three largest programs on its FY 2019 Form 990 as:
Spent in most recent FY
Percent of program expenses
Symphonic Concerts
Spent in most recent FY
Percent of program expenses
Opera Performances
Spent in most recent FY
Percent of program expenses
Deer Valley Music Festival
Utah Symphony & Opera cannot currently be evaluated by our Culture & Community methodology because we have not received data from the charity regarding its Constituent Feedback or Equity Practices strategies.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
Learn More
Utah Symphony & Opera has earned a 100% for the Leadership & Adaptability beacon. See the metrics below for more information.
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's leadership capacity, strategic thinking and planning, and ability to innovate or respond to changes in constituent demand/need or other relevant social and economic conditions to achieve the organization's mission.
Learn more
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's mission
Connect the community through great live music. To perform. To engage. To inspire.
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization’s vision.
Utah Symphony | Utah Opera is committed to serving the people of our state and beyond as the premier provider of the orchestral and operatic art forms. Our orchestral performances span the traditions of the past and challenge what is possible in the future. We offer opera productions that showcase emerging and established artists, celebrate traditional opera, and champion the American operatic tradition. Each summer in Park City we present a variety of musical experiences in Utah's casual mountain lifestyle at the Deer Valley Music Festival. We lead in arts education and promote life-long learning through the arts. We serve as a catalyst for innovation, advocacy, and impact in our state. We truly believe that providing our neighbors, children, friends, and others in our state with high-caliber, live music experiences helps make Utah a great place to live.
Source: Nonprofit submitted responses
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking and goal setting through sharing their most important strategic goals.
Goal One: Increase audience engagement by presenting works that resonate with our many and varied communities; build meaningful and enduring relationships through our art forms.
Goal Type: Grow, expand, scale or increase access to the existing programs and services.
Goal Two: Prioritize and respond to the needs, interests, and values of our communities in all aspects of our programming, including repertoire, featured artists, and meaningful education programs
Goal Type: Focus on core programs to achieve mission and scale back on programs not seen as core.
Goal Three: Foster innovation and embrace change and creativity in ways that demonstrate the ability of the arts to reflect and impact our communities and society.
Goal Type: New program(s) based on observed changes in needs among our constituencies/communities served.
The nonprofit provides evidence of investment in leadership development
Employees attended industry conferences, both virtually and in person, to share and build best practices.
The nonprofit provides evidence of leadership through focusing externally and mobilizing resources for the mission.
Strategic Partnerships
Networks of Collective Impact Efforts
Thought Leadership
Raising Awareness
Community Building
Policy Advocacy
We partner and collaborate with many other non-profits in the community such as the Madeleine Choir School, the Road Home, Vet Tix, and the Moran Eye Center to name a few. We work in a unified effort with other arts organizations to advocate for funds from the state legislature for Professional Outreach Programs, and the Zoo, Arts, and Parks program, a county-wide 1/10 of 1% sales tax to benefit cultural organizations. We work closely with state and local agencies in partnership with the private sector to support our programming and facilities, and we work with the Downtown Alliance and the Office of Tourism to promote the arts. We have been invited to present and participate in many local conferences and clubs. We partner with other arts organizations on artistic initiatives that share common goals and issues.
The nonprofit has an opportunity to tell the story of how the organization adapted to tremendous external changes in the last year.
Our mission relies on gathering together to perform and enjoy entertainment. Singing and playing wind or brass instruments are especially problematic during a pandemic. Accordingly, our first and foremost efforts were to protect our artists and audiences and to make the necessary changes to ensure our future viability. We hired engineers from the University of Utah to study the airflow and our venues and to make recommendations about the best configuration to avoid the transmission of covid. We adapted our repertoire initially to perform only pieces with strings which could be performed masked. Eventually we reconfigured the orchestra seating to include other instruments from the wind and brass sections. Singers learned to rehearse for operas with minimal casts while masked. Artists were tested regularly, and special venting systems were created to minimize the spread of the virus. Audience capacities were reduced, and proof of vaccination or a negative test and masking were required. Since the early days of the pandemic, the company has rebounded with a return to our regular schedule, and ticket sales have been at 90% of projections. Education programs during the last year have been offered in a hybrid of in person and virtual programs depending on the situation. We continue to adapt as necessary.
Impact & Results
Accountability & Finance
Culture & Community
Leadership & Adaptability
The Giving Basket is having some issues. If you wish to donate, please refresh the page. If the problem persists contact us.
Cart ID: Not Assigned
The Giving Basket is having some issues. If you wish to donate, please refresh the page. If the problem persists contact us.
Cart ID: Not Assigned