CEC
CEC
Fort Worth TX | IRS ruling year: 1994 | EIN: 75-2231694
Our vision at the Community Enrichment Center (CEC) is to break the cycle of poverty and family violence. For 30 years, the CEC has been a partner in change to our N ... (More)
Your donation attempt encountered a problem. Please refresh the page to try again.
You're faster than our page! Give the page a little longer to finish loading and try your donation again.
Fort Worth TX | IRS ruling year: 1994 | EIN: 75-2231694
Our vision at the Community Enrichment Center (CEC) is to break the cycle of poverty and family violence. For 30 years, the CEC has been a partner in change to our N ... (More)
Our vision at the Community Enrichment Center (CEC) is to break the cycle of poverty and family violence. For 30 years, the CEC has been a partner in change to our Northeast Tarrant low-income neighbors. The CEC has continued to grow and expand our services to serve victims of family violence, homeless and low-income families and individuals across Tarrant County. Today, the CEC empowers families to improve their lives through immediate assistance and long-term career development focusing on employment coaching, training, education and life skills. Our mission is accomplished by empowering families to be self-sufficient through Christian compassion and encouragement that guides them toward a bright future which will end their cycle of poverty and/or family violence. (Less)
Great
This charity's score is 93%, earning it a Four-Star rating. If this organization aligns with your passions and values, you can give with confidence.
This overall score is calculated from multiple beacon scores: 90% Accountability & Finance, 10% Leadership & Adaptability. Learn more about our criteria and methodology.
We recognize that not all metrics and beacons equally predict a charity’s success. The percentage each beacon contributes to the organization’s overall rating depends on the number of beacons an organization has earned.
Use the tool below to select different beacons to see how the weighting shifts when only one, two, or three beacons are earned.
Date Published | Form 990 FYE | Overall Score | Overall Rating |
Rating Version: 2.1 | |||
7/1/2021 | 2019 | 92.22 | |
6/1/2020 | 2018 | 97.17 | |
11/1/2019 | 2017 | 93.90 | |
6/1/2018 | 2016 | 92.46 | |
7/1/2017 | 2015 | 91.36 | |
10/1/2016 | 2014 | 92.92 | |
6/1/2016 | 2014 | 92.38 | |
This organization received multiple star ratings within this fiscal year, due to an update to its Accountability and Transparency data and/or the receipt of an amended Form 990. | |||
Rating Version: 2.0 | |||
2/1/2016 | 2014 | 82.84 | |
12/22/2015 | 2014 | 78.82 | |
12/1/2014 | 2013 | 89.32 |
The IRS is significantly delayed in processing nonprofits' annual tax filings (Forms 990). As a result, the Accountability & Finance score for CEC is outdated and the overall rating may not be representative of its current operations. Please check with the charity directly for any questions you may have.
CEC has earned a 92% for the Accountability & Finance beacon. See the metrics below for more information.
This beacon provides an assessment of a charity's financial health (financial efficiency, sustainability, and trustworthiness) and its commitment to governance practices and policies.
This Accountability & Finance score represents IRS Form 990 data up until FY 2019, which is the most recent Form 990 currently available to us.
Learn more
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990 that the organization has these governance practices in place.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990
Independent Voting Board Members ... (More) The presence of an independent governing body is strongly recommended by many industry professionals to allow for full deliberation and diversity of thinking on governance and other organizational matters. Our analysts check the Form 990 to determine if the independent Board members are a voting majority and also at least five in number. (Less) | |
No Material Diversion of Assets ... (More) A diversion of assets – any unauthorized conversion or use of the organization's assets other than for the organization's authorized purposes, including but not limited to embezzlement or theft – can seriously call into question a charity's financial integrity. We check the charity's last two Forms 990 to see if the charity has reported any diversion of assets. If the charity does report a diversion, then we check to see if it complied with the Form 990 instructions by describing what happened and its corrective action. This metric will be assigned to one of the following categories:
| |
Audited Financials Prepared by Independent Accountant ... (More) Audited financial statements provide important information about financial accountability and accuracy. They should be prepared by an independent accountant with oversight from an audit committee. (It is not necessary that the audit committee be a separate committee. Often at smaller charities, it falls within the responsibilities of the finance committee or the executive committee.) The committee provides an important oversight layer between the management of the organization, which is responsible for the financial information reported, and the independent accountant, who reviews the financials and issues an opinion based on its findings. We check the charity's Form 990 reporting to see if it meets this criteria.
| |
Does Not Provide Loan(s) to or Receive Loan(s) From Related Parties ... (More) Making loans to related parties such as key officers, staff, or Board members, is not standard practice in the sector as it may divert the charity's funds away from its charitable mission and can lead to real and perceived conflict-of-interest problems. This practice is discouraged by sector trade groups which point to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when they call for charities to refrain from making loans to directors and executives. And the IRS is concerned enough with the practice that it requires charities to disclose on their Form 990 any loans to or from current and former officers, directors, trustees, key employees, and other "disqualified persons." Furthermore, some state laws go so far as to prohibit loans to board members and officers. And although employees and trustees are permitted to make loans to charities, this practice can also result in real and/or perceived conflict of interest problems for the charity. Furthermore, it is problematic because it is an indicator that the organization is not financially secure. (Less) | |
Documents Board Meeting Minutes ... (More) An official record of the events that take place during a board meeting ensures that a contemporaneous document exists for future reference. Charities are not required to make their Board meeting minutes available to the public. As such, we are not able to review and critique their minutes. For this performance metric, we are checking to see if the charity reports on its Form 990 that it does keep those minutes. In the future, we will also track and rate whether or not a charity keeps minutes for its committee meetings. (Less) | |
Distributes 990 to Board Before Filing ... (More) Providing copies of the Form to the governing body in advance of filing is considered a best practice, as it allows for thorough review by the individuals charged with overseeing the organization. The Form 990 asks the charity to disclose whether or not it has followed this best practice. If the charity has not distributed its Form 990 to the board before filing, then we deduct 4 points from its Accountability and Transparency score. (Less) | |
Does not Compensate Board Members ... (More) The IRS requires that any compensation paid to members of the charity's governing body be listed on the Form 990. Furthermore, all members of the governing body need to be listed whether or not they are compensated. It is not unusual for some members of the board to have compensation listed. The executive director of the organization frequently has a seat on the board, for instance, and is compensated for being a full time staff member. However, it is rare for a charity to compensate individuals only for serving on its Board of Directors. Although this sort of board compensation is not illegal, it is not considered a best practice. (Less) |
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990, or for some metrics on the charity's website, that the organization has these policies in place.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990 and organization's website
Conflict of Interest ... (More) Such a policy protects the organization, and by extension those it serves, when it is considering entering into a transaction that may benefit the private interest of an officer or director of the organization. Charities are not required to share their conflict of interest policies with the public. Although we can not evaluate the substance of its policy, we can tell you if the charity has one in place based on the information it reports on its Form 990. If the charity does not have a Conflict of Interest policy, then we deduct 4 points from its Accountability and Transparency score. (Less) | |
Whistleblower ... (More) This policy outlines procedures for handling employee complaints, as well as a confidential way for employees to report any financial mismanagement. Here we are reporting on the existence of a policy as reported by the charity on its Form 990. (Less) | |
Records Retention and Destruction ... (More) Such a policy establishes guidelines for handling, backing up, archiving and destruction of documents. These guidelines foster good record keeping procedures that promotes data integrity. Here we are reporting on the existence of a policy as reported by the charity on its Form 990. If the charity does not have a Records Retention and Destruction Policy, then we deduct 4 points from its Accountability and Transparency score. (Less) | |
CEO Compensation Process ... (More) This process indicates that the organization has a documented policy that it follows year after year. The policy should indicate that an objective and independent review process of the CEO's compensation has been conducted which includes benchmarking against comparable organizations. We check to be sure that the charity has reported on its Form 990 its process for determining its CEO pay. (Less) | |
Donor Privacy ... (More) Donors can be reluctant to contribute to a charity when their name, address, or other basic information may become part of donor lists that are exchanged or sold, resulting in an influx of charitable solicitations from other organizations. Our analysts check the charity's website to see if the organization has a donor privacy policy in place and what it does and does not cover. Privacy policies are assigned to one of the following categories:
The privacy policy must be specific to donor information. A general website policy which references "visitor" or "user" personal information will not suffice. A policy that refers to donor information collected on the website is also not sufficient as the policy must be comprehensive and applicable to both online and offline donors. The existence of a privacy policy of any type does not prohibit the charity itself from contacting the donor for informational, educational, or solicitation purposes. (Less) |
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990, or for some metrics on the charity's website, that the organization makes this information easily accessible.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990 and organization's website
CEO Salary Listed on 990 ... (More) Charities are required to list their CEO's name and compensation on the Form 990. Our analysts check to be sure that the charities complied with the Form 990 instructions and included this information in their filing. (Less) | |
Board of Directors Listed on Website ... (More) Our analysts check to see if the charity lists Board members on its website. Publishing this information enables donors and other stakeholders to ascertain the make up of the charity's governing body. This enables stakeholders to report concerns to the Board. Charity Navigator does not cross-check the Board members listed on the website with that reported on the Form 990, because the latter often isn't available until more than a year after the charity's fiscal year ends. In that time, the charity's Board members may have changed, and the charity typically reflects those more recent changes on the website. (Less) | |
Key Staff Listed on Website ... (More) It is important for donors and other stakeholders to know who runs the organization day-to-day. Charity Navigator does not cross-check the leadership listed on the website with that reported on the Form 990 because the latter often isn't available until more than a year after the charity's fiscal year ends. In that time, the charity's leadership may have changed and the charity typically reflects those more recent changes on the website. In other words, since the Form 990 isn't especially timely, it can not be used to verify the leadership information published on the charity's site. (Less) | |
Audited Financial Statements Listed on Website ... (More) We check the charity's website to see if it has published its audited financial statements for the fiscal year represented by the most recently filed IRS Form 990. It is important for donors to have easy access to this financial report to help determine if the organization is managing its financial resources well. We currently rate charities on whether or not they publish their audit on their website. (Less) | |
Form 990 Available on Website ... (More) We check the charity's website to see if it has published its most recently filed IRS Form 990 (a direct link to the charity's 990 on an external site is sufficient). It is important for donors to have easy access to this financial report to help determine if the organization is managing its financial resources well. (Less) |
The Liabilities to Assets Ratio is determined by Total Liabilities divided by Total Assets (most recent 990).
Part of our goal in rating the financial performance of charities is to help donors assess the financial capacity and sustainability of a charity. As do organizations in other sectors, charities must be mindful of their management of total liabilites in relation to their total assets. This ratio is an indicator of an organization’s solvency and or long term sustainability. Dividing a charity's total liabilities by its total assets yields this percentage.
Source: IRS Form 990
Determines how long a charity could sustain its level of spending using its net available assets, or working capital, as reported on its most recently filed Form 990. We include in a charity's working capital unrestricted and temporarily restricted net assets, and exclude permanently restricted net assets. Dividing these net available assets in the most recent year by a charity's average total expenses, yields the working capital ratio. We calculate the charity's average total expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
The amount spent to raise $1 in charitable contributions. To calculate a charity's fundraising efficiency, we divide its average fundraising expenses by the average total contributions it receives. We calculate the charity's average expenses and average contributions over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
As reported by charities on their IRS Form 990, this measure reflects what percent of its total budget a charity spends on overhead, administrative staff and associated costs, and organizational meetings. Dividing a charity's average administrative expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
This measure reflects what a charity spends to raise money. Fundraising expenses can include campaign printing, publicity, mailing, and staffing and costs incurred in soliciting donations, memberships, and grants. Dividing a charity's average fundraising expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
The Program Expense Ratio is determined by Program Expenses divided by Total Expense (average of most recent three 990s).
This measure reflects the percent of its total expenses a charity spends on the programs and services it exists to deliver. Dividing a charity's average program expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Organizations that demonstrate consistent annual growth in program expenses are able to outpace inflation and thus sustain their programs year to year. These organizations also supply givers with greater confidence by maintaining broad public support for their programs. We compute the average annual growth of program expenses using the following formula: [(Yn/Y0)(1/n)]-1, where Y0 is a charity's program expenses in the first year of the interval analyzed, Yn is the charity's program expenses in the most recent year, and n is the interval of years passed between Y0 and Yn.
Source: IRS Form 990
This chart displays the trend of revenue and expenses over the past several years for this organization, as reported on their IRS Form 990.
Presented here are this organizations key compensated staff members as identified by our analysts. This compensation data includes salary, cash bonuses and expense accounts and is displayed exactly how it is reported to the IRS. The amounts do not include nontaxable benefits, deferred compensation, or other amounts not reported on Form W-2. In some cases, these amounts may include compensation from related organizations. Read the IRS policies for compensation reporting
Charles R. Clinton, President
$114,700 (1.70% of Total Expenses)
Current CEO and Board Chair can be found in the Leadership & Adaptability report below.
Source: IRS Form 990 (page 7), filing year 2019
Below are some key data points from the Exempt Organization IRS Business Master File (BMF) for this organization. Learn more about the BMF on the IRS website
Activities:
Community service organization (BMF activity code: 408)
Foundation Status:
Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (BMF foundation code: 15)
Affiliation:
Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary (i.e., not affiliated with a National, Regional, or Geographic grouping of organizations). (BMF affiliation code: 3)
The Form 990 is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage finance and accountability data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to search for this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website (if any are available). Simply enter the organization's name (CEC) or EIN (752231694) in the 'Search Term' field.
This organization was impacted by COVID-19 in a way that effected their financial health in 2020. This normally would have reduced their star rating. Due to the unprecedented nature of the pandemic, we give charities such as this one the opportunity to share the story of COVID's impact on them, and doing this pauses our revision of their rating. Charities may submit their own pandemic responses through their nonprofit portal.
CEC reported being impacted by COVID-19 in the following ways:
Program Delivery
Fundraising Capacity
Revenue
Staffing
Administrative Capacity
How COVID-19 impacted the organization's operations financially:
We designed our 2020 organizational budget before the onset of the pandemic. We responded early in the year by quickly developing strategies to utilize current funding, and sought to secure additional funding, to help us best address the needs our community was facing. We especially recognized needs in the employment and financial coaching area and job training. Another challenge we faced was the inability to host our annual fundraising event, the Love and Hope Gala. This event has typically resulted in raising a large amount of the annual support for programs our community has come to rely on. Yet another challenge is that many of our annual funders had to make the difficult decision to reduce charitable giving or withhold funding completely this year because of limited resources due to market shifts resulting from the pandemic.
How COVID-19 impacted the organization's delivery of programs:
As the pandemic began to spread, we experienced large scale shutdowns of area businesses, interruptions in supply chains and long periods of food scarcity. The consequences of these brought the CEC a sharp rise in the number of people seeking emergency food from our food pantry. Extensive job loss was also a contributor, increasing the number people who lacked the income necessary to buy enough food for their families. This tended to impact low-income families who were struggling pre-pandemic the hardest. In order to meet the significant increase in demand required we increase the quantity of food we obtain to assure adequate support for those of our community in need. We also saw an increase in need for providing employment and financial coaching in order to improve people’s financial capabilities and increase their skill sets to help them gain employment and improve their earning potential.
How this organization adapted to changing conditions caused by COVID-19:
Our Food Pantry modified operations according to emergency restrictions to provide food for triple the number of families we typically serve. A drive-through process was developed to maintain social distancing with sanitation stations and PPE providing protection for the community and staff. All staff and volunteers were required to pass a temperature screening and report any possible symptoms prior to entering the building each day. Coaching staff, unable to meet clients in person, pivoted to Zoom sessions to meet the needs of their clients. Due to CDC restrictions on gatherings, we cancelled our fall fundraiser, leading to the loss of funding we have come to rely on from the annual event. We also modified our community events Refresh BISD in August and Breakfast with Santa in December. This resulted in designing a drive-through process to enable the distribution of 2,276 school supply kits and 2,900 Christmas gifts for low income families, with provisions of nutritious food as well.
Innovations the organization intends to continue permanently after the pandemic:
Our experience from redesigning program processes to adhere to COVID-19 safety regulations resulted in us discovering a few unexpected benefits in continuing some of them. There were a number of staff that shifted to working remotely from home during periods of the State of Texas mandated health and safety restrictions. The ability for remote access for staff remains in place when circumstances make this option more beneficial. We also recognized a benefit to providing clients the flexibility to meet with their coaches remotely when in-person visits are not possible. This increases potential engagement opportunities to maximize program efficiency and effectiveness for our coaches and clients. We have also found advantages to offering Board members the flexibility to attend critical meetings via Zoom and other online platforms, to assure attendance and meet targeted requirement for agenda topics.
Not Currently Scored
CEC cannot currently be evaluated by our Impact & Results methodology because either (A) it is eligible, but we have not yet received data; (B) we have not yet developed an algorithm to estimate its programmatic impact; (C) its programs are not direct services; or (D) it is not heavily reliant on contributions from individual donors.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
Learn More
CEC reported its three largest programs on its FY 2019 Form 990 as:
Spent in most recent FY
Percent of program expenses
Affordable Housing Program
Spent in most recent FY
Percent of program expenses
Housing Program for Homeless Families
Spent in most recent FY
Percent of program expenses
Community Outreach Program for Direct Aid and Food
CEC cannot currently be evaluated by our Culture & Community methodology because we have not received data from the charity regarding its Constituent Feedback or Equity Practices strategies.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
Learn More
CEC has earned a 100% for the Leadership & Adaptability beacon. See the metrics below for more information.
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's leadership capacity, strategic thinking and planning, and ability to innovate or respond to changes in constituent demand/need or other relevant social and economic conditions to achieve the organization's mission.
Learn more
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's mission
Our mission is to change lives by restoring hope and sharing God's love.
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization’s vision.
Our vision at the Community Enrichment Center (CEC) is to break the cycle of poverty and family violence. For 30 years, the CEC has been a partner in change to our Northeast Tarrant County low-income neighbors. The CEC has continued to grow and expand our services to serve homeless and low-income families and victims of domestic violence across Tarrant County. Today, the CEC empowers families to improve their lives through immediate assistance and long-term career development focusing on employment coaching, training, education and life skills. Our mission is accomplished by empowering families to be self-sufficient through Christian compassion and encouragement that guides them toward a bright future which will end their cycle of poverty and/or family violence.
Source: Nonprofit submitted responses
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking and goal setting through sharing their most important strategic goals.
Goal One: 1. Recruit an Employment Specialist to coordinate employment positions for participants in our programs and cultivate relationships with area businesses to align clients to an in-demand career path.
Goal Type: New program(s) based on observed changes in needs among our constituencies/communities served.
Goal Two: 2. Increase the number of families engaged in the Housing PLUS program, leading to an increased number of graduates moving from the program and into permanent, secure housing, independent of the CEC.
Goal Type: Grow, expand, scale or increase access to the existing programs and services.
Goal Three: 3. Increase the number of participants actively engaged in bundled services, aligning each graduate with employment opportunities that align with the certification they achieved in the program.
Goal Type: Grow, expand, scale or increase access to the existing programs and services.
The nonprofit provides evidence of investment in leadership development
Our second founding President and CEO of 25 years retired last year, resulting in the Board of Directors recruiting a new CEO with a fresh leadership approach. The decision was also made to bring in a leadership development coach to work with the entire leadership team. The coach worked with leadership as a group and one on one to explore strengths and create strategies to help the agency reach its highest potential. This training has already shown positive results agency wide, improving team cohesion and overall program efficiency and effectiveness.
The nonprofit provides evidence of leadership through focusing externally and mobilizing resources for the mission.
Strategic Partnerships
Networks of Collective Impact Efforts
Raising Awareness
Community Building
We engage with our community to share and demonstrate our mission through a number of community outreach events such as Refresh BISD and our Breakfast with Santa events. We also speak at local Chambers of Commerce and other community events. We are dedicated to providing outreach and educational presentations for local schools and area churches about the programs we offer as well, and identify ways we can engage and partner with our community to achieve our mission and provide stabilization services for people in need.
The nonprofit has an opportunity to tell the story of how the organization adapted to tremendous external changes in the last year.
The first challenge we faced came in identifying a plan to continue providing emergency food for people in need from our community through our food pantry, amidst periods of food scarcity during COVID-19. Our response was to design an alternate drive-through food distribution system that followed CDC guidelines to assure the health and safety of our community and staff. As we engaged with our food pantry visitors, we gained greater understanding of the most pressing needs our community was facing. This drove the design and development of a new program aimed to provide the support that would make quick and significant impacts for families negatively impacted by COVID-19. The Pathways program, a hybrid of our Housing PLUS program, specifically addresses the most critical needs faced by those who experienced a loss of income or loss of employment due to the pandemic. The program aligns them with short-term trainings and certifications to increase income potential and usher them into a new and in-demand career path.
Impact & Results
Accountability & Finance
Culture & Community
Leadership & Adaptability
The Giving Basket is having some issues. If you wish to donate, please refresh the page. If the problem persists contact us.
Cart ID: Not Assigned
The Giving Basket is having some issues. If you wish to donate, please refresh the page. If the problem persists contact us.
Cart ID: Not Assigned