Mission: Seeking to put God's love into action, South Puget Sound (SPS) Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope. Founded in 1989, SPS ... (More)
South Puget Sound Habitat for Humanity is a 501(c)(3) organization, with an IRS ruling year of 1987, and donations may or may not be tax-deductible.
Is this your nonprofit? Apply for a Star Rating Portal to submit data and edit your profile.
Contact Information
711 Capitol Way South
Suite 401
Olympia WA 98501
You are viewing this organization's new Charity Navigator profile page. To view the legacy version, click here.
Star Rating System by Charity Navigator
Charity Navigator evaluates a nonprofit organization’s financial health including measures of stability, efficiency and sustainability. We also track accountability and transparency policies to ensure the good governance and integrity of the organization.
Good
This charity's score is 86.32, earning it a 3-Star rating. Donors can "Give with Confidence" to this charity.
This score is calculated from two sub-scores:
Finance: 92.91 View details
Accountability & Transparency: 82.00 View details
This score represents Form 990 data from 2019, the latest year published by the IRS.
View this organization’s historical ratings.
Star Rated Report
This beta feature is currently viewable only on desktop or tablet screens. Check back later for updates.
Program Expense Ratio
77.7%
The Program Expense Ratio is determined by Program Expenses divided by Total Expense (average of most recent three 990s).
This measure reflects the percent of its total expenses a charity spends on the programs and services it exists to deliver. Dividing a charity's average program expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Administrative Expenses
15.5%
As reported by charities on their IRS Form 990, this measure reflects what percent of its total budget a charity spends on overhead, administrative staff and associated costs, and organizational meetings. Dividing a charity's average administrative expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Fundraising Expenses
6.6%
This measure reflects what a charity spends to raise money. Fundraising expenses can include campaign printing, publicity, mailing, and staffing and costs incurred in soliciting donations, memberships, and grants. Dividing a charity's average fundraising expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Liabilities to Assets Ratio
34.1%
The Liabilities to Assets Ratio is determined by Total Liabilities divided by Total Assets (most recent 990).
Part of our goal in rating the financial performance of charities is to help donors assess the financial capacity and sustainability of a charity. As do organizations in other sectors, charities must be mindful of their management of total liabilites in relation to their total assets. This ratio is an indicator of an organization’s solvency and or long term sustainability. Dividing a charity's total liabilities by its total assets yields this percentage.
Source: IRS Form 990
Fundraising Efficiency
$0.05
The amount spent to raise $1 in charitable contributions. To calculate a charity's fundraising efficiency, we divide its average fundraising expenses by the average total contributions it receives. We calculate the charity's average expenses and average contributions over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Working Capital Ratio
1.50 years
Determines how long a charity could sustain its level of spending using its net available assets, or working capital, as reported on its most recently filed Form 990. We include in a charity's working capital unrestricted and temporarily restricted net assets, and exclude permanently restricted net assets. Dividing these net available assets in the most recent year by a charity's average total expenses, yields the working capital ratio. We calculate the charity's average total expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Program Expense Growth
16.60%
We compute the average annual growth of program expenses using the following formula: [(Yn/Y0)(1/n)]-1, where Y0 is a charity's program expenses in the first year of the interval analyzed, Yn is the charity's program expenses in the most recent year, and n is the interval of years passed between Y0 and Yn.
Source: IRS Form 990
Governance
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990 that the organization has these governance practices in place.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990
| Governance: | |
|---|---|
| Independent Voting Board Members ... (More) | |
| No Material Diversion of Assets ... (More) A diversion of assets – any unauthorized conversion or use of the organization's assets other than for the organization's authorized purposes, including but not limited to embezzlement or theft – can seriously call into question a charity's financial integrity. We check the charity's last two Forms 990 to see if the charity has reported any diversion of assets. If the charity does report a diversion, then we check to see if it complied with the Form 990 instructions by describing what happened and its corrective action. This metric will be assigned to one of the following categories:
| |
| Audited Financials Prepared by Independent Accountant ... (More) Audited financial statements provide important information about financial accountability and accuracy. They should be prepared by an independent accountant with oversight from an audit committee. (It is not necessary that the audit committee be a separate committee. Often at smaller charities, it falls within the responsibilities of the finance committee or the executive committee.) The committee provides an important oversight layer between the management of the organization, which is responsible for the financial information reported, and the independent accountant, who reviews the financials and issues an opinion based on its findings. We check the charity's Form 990 reporting to see if it meets this criteria.
| Partial |
| Does Not Provide Loan(s) to or Receive Loan(s) From Related Parties ... (More) | |
| Documents Board Meeting Minutes ... (More) | |
| Distributes 990 to Board Before Filing ... (More) | |
| Compensates Board ... (More) |
Policies
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990, or for some metrics on the charity's website, that the organization has these policies in place.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990 and organization's website
| Policies: | |
|---|---|
| Conflict of Interest ... (More) | |
| Whistleblower ... (More) | |
| Records Retention and Destruction ... (More) | |
| CEO Compensation Process ... (More) | |
| Donor Privacy ... (More) Donors can be reluctant to contribute to a charity when their name, address, or other basic information may become part of donor lists that are exchanged or sold, resulting in an influx of charitable solicitations from other organizations. Our analysts check the charity's website to see if the organization has a donor privacy policy in place and what it does and does not cover. Privacy policies are assigned to one of the following categories:
The privacy policy must be specific to donor information. A general website policy which references "visitor" or "user" personal information will not suffice. A policy that refers to donor information collected on the website is also not sufficient as the policy must be comprehensive and applicable to both online and offline donors. The existence of a privacy policy of any type does not prohibit the charity itself from contacting the donor for informational, educational, or solicitation purposes. (Less) |
Transparency
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990, or for some metrics on the charity's website, that the organization makes this information easily accessible.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990 and organization's website
| Transparency: | |
|---|---|
| CEO Salary Listed on 990 ... (More) | |
| Board of Directors Listed on Website ... (More) | |
| Key Staff Listed on Website ... (More) | |
| Audited Financial Statements on Website ... (More) | |
| Form 990 Available on Website ... (More) |
Additional Information
Unscored
This beta feature is currently viewable only on desktop or tablet screens. Check back later for updates.
Total Revenue and Expenses
This chart displays the trend of revenue and expenses over the past several years for this organization, as reported on their IRS Form 990.
Salary of Key Persons
Presented here are this organizations key compensated staff members as identified by our analysts. This compensation data includes salary, cash bonuses and expense accounts and is displayed exactly how it is reported to the IRS. The amounts do not include nontaxable benefits, deferred compensation, or other amounts not reported on Form W-2. In some cases, these amounts may include compensation from related organizations. Read the IRS policies for compensation reporting
Carly Colgan, Executive Director
$43,475 (2.09% of Total Expenses)
Current CEO and Board Chair can be found in the Leadership & Adaptability report below.
Source: IRS Form 990 (page 7), filing year 2021
Business Master File Data
Below are some key data points from the Exempt Organization IRS Business Master File (BMF) for this organization. Learn more about the BMF on the IRS website
Activities:
Instruction and guidance on housing (BMF activity code: 398)
Low-income housing (BMF activity code: 380)
Foundation Status:
Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (BMF foundation code: 15)
Affiliation:
Subordinate - the organization is a subordinate in a group ruling. (BMF affiliation code: 9)
Data Sources: IRS Forms 990
The Form 990 is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage finance and accountability data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to view this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website (if any are available).
Pandemic Response
Due to the unprecedented nature of the pandemic, we give charities such as this one the opportunity to share the story of COVID's impact on them. Charities may submit their own pandemic responses through their nonprofit portal.
South Puget Sound Habitat for Humanity reported being impacted by COVID-19 in the following ways:
Program Delivery
Fundraising Capacity
Revenue
Staffing
Administrative Capacity
How COVID-19 impacted the organization's operations financially:
Not applicable to South Puget Sound Habitat
How COVID-19 impacted the organization's delivery of programs:
Lumber prices have gone up dramatically. Trusses went from average of $3,942 to $5,279 - an increase of 34%. Framing costs for homes completed in 2020 (pre-COVID) averaged $12,458 and in February 2021, the average framing cost was $18,287 - an increase of 46%. A recent analysis of material cost increases reflects an average increase of 36% per home (approximately $37,423). Other examples: • Drywall: Budgeted at $9,500, actual cost $17,750 – increased 87% • Insulation: Budgeted at $3,500, actual cost $5,700 – increased 63% • Windows: Budgeted at $2,000, actual cost $2,672 – increased 34% We also operate two Habitat Stores that provide a critical source of operating revenue for SPSHFH. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, South Puget Sound Habitat had to close both Habitat Stores for 12 weeks in the spring of 2020 resulting in a loss of over $325,000 in revenue. We received PPP funding, which covered payroll for our staff while the two Habitat Stores were closed for 12 weeks.
How this organization adapted to changing conditions caused by COVID-19:
The COVID-19 pandemic for South Puget Sound Habitat has meant slower construction schedules. Pre-COVID, we relied on volunteers for many construction tasks. However, due to safety regulations, mainly Habitat construction staff and sub-contractors have been allowed on our build sites. Homeowners and their families have been able to be on-site to complete their sweat equity hours while following COVID-19 safety precautions. As restrictions have started lifting, South Puget Sound Habitat has been able to invite more volunteers back on the construction site and that will help projects move forward at a quicker pace. It has also been harder to find and schedule sub-contractors, and the city’s design reviews are taking longer. Again, we are hopeful that fewer restrictions will mean getting this work done easier.
Innovations the organization intends to continue permanently after the pandemic:
In 2018, South Puget Sound Habitat identified diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) as guiding principles. We held internal group learning opportunities focused on US postwar housing discrimination, the wealth gap, and the stark homeownership gap for communities of color. We discussed where our organization fits in this system of oppression and how we can focus on creating a more equitable community. In 2020, staff explored how white dominant culture manifests in our organization, named org practices that cause harm and inequity, built antiracist skills, and operationalized racial equity. Our agency-wide DEI committee meets monthly to discuss how different topics manifest in our organization. We hired a Human Resources firm to bring an equity lens to our hiring practices, job descriptions, employee handbook, compensation philosophy, performance review process, and general employee engagement and communication.
Historical Ratings
| Date Published | Form 990 FYE | Overall Score | Overall Rating |
| Rating Version: 2.1 | |||
| 12/1/2020 | 2019 | 86.32 | |
| 4/1/2020 | 2018 | 83.70 | |
Previous: Finance & Accountability / Next: Leadership & Adaptability
Impact & Results
This score estimates the actual impact a nonprofit has on the lives of those it serves, and determines whether it is making good use of donor resources to achieve that impact.
Impact & Results Score
Not Currently Scored
South Puget Sound Habitat for Humanity cannot currently be evaluated by our Encompass Rating Impact & Results methodology because either (A) it is eligible, but we have not yet received data; (B) we have not yet developed an algorithm to estimate its programmatic impact; (C) its programs are not direct services; or (D) it is not heavily reliant on contributions from individual donors.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
Do you work at South Puget Sound Habitat for Humanity? Join the waitlist for an updated Impact & Results score.
Additional Information
Unscored
This beta feature is currently viewable only on desktop or tablet screens. Check back later for updates.
Largest Programs
South Puget Sound Habitat for Humanity reported its three largest programs on its FY 2021 Form 990 as:
$2,620,101
Spent in most recent FY
94%
Percent of program expenses
HOMEOWNERSHIP PROGRAM: FAMILIES IN NEED OF A DECENT PLACE TO LIVE BUILD SAFE AND AFFORDABLE HOMES IN PARTNERSHIP WITH US. HABITAT HOUSES ARE MODESTLY SIZED. THEY ARE LARGE ENOUGH FOR THE HOMEOWNER FAM ... (More)
$32,636
Spent in most recent FY
1%
Percent of program expenses
NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION PROGRAM: THROUGH OUR NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION WORK, WE TAILOR OUR EFFORTS BY PARTNERING LOCALLY WITH RESIDENTS AND COMMUNITY LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS TO BEST ADDRESS TH ... (More)
$132,448
Spent in most recent FY
4%
Percent of program expenses
HOME PRESERVATION PROGRAM: OUR HOME PRESERVATION PROGRAM IS AN OUTREACH INITIATIVE THAT SEEKS TO PROVIDE A WIDE RANGE OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW- TO MODERATE-INCOME HOMEOWNERS, INCLUDING VETERANS AND SE ... (More)
Previous: Impact & Results / Next: Culture & Community
Leadership & Adaptability
This score provides an assessment of the organization's leadership capacity, strategic thinking and planning, and ability to innovate or respond to changes in constituent demand/need or other relevant social and economic conditions to achieve the organization's mission.
Leadership & Adaptability Score
100
out of 100
The score earned by South Puget Sound Habitat for Humanity is a passing score. This score has no effect on the organization's Star Rating.
Encompass Rating V4 provides an evaluation of the organization's Leadership & Adaptability through the nonprofit organization submitting a survey response directly to Charity Navigator.
Leadership & Adaptability Report
100
of 100 points
Mission
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization’s mission
Seeking to put God’s love into action, South Puget Sound Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope. We are the local affiliate of Habitat for Humanity International and serves Thurston County, Washington. We’re an autonomous, 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, and we are governed locally, raise funds locally, and build locally. A Christian-based, ecumenical (all-inclusive), nonprofit organization, South Puget Sound Habitat is welcoming to people of any or no faith. Founded in 1989, we are the only builder of affordable, owner-occupied housing units for low- to moderate-income households in Thurston County.
Source: Nonprofit submitted responses
Vision
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization’s vision.
We envision a world where everyone has a decent place to live. No matter who we are or where we come from, we all deserve a decent place to call home. Our core values and guiding principles — diversity, equity, and inclusion, future generations, people first, community, and integrity — shepherd our work. We take very seriously our purpose and place in an ever-evolving community. This leads us to regularly reflect, evaluate, and progress internally as an organization working to be an innovator for the future of housing in Thurston County.
Source: Nonprofit submitted responses
Strategic Goals
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking and goal setting through sharing their most important strategic goals.
Goal One: Grow the number of families served
Goal Type: Grow, expand, scale or increase access to the existing programs and services.
Goal Two: Grow our home building capacity
Goal Type: Invest in the capacity of our organization (financial, management, technical, etc.).
Goal Three: Grow our store profits
Goal Type: Invest in the capacity of our organization (financial, management, technical, etc.).
Source: Nonprofit submitted responses
Leadership Development
The nonprofit provides evidence of investment in leadership development
Describe an investment in leadership
In November 2020, we partnered with RisewithKJ LLC (risewithkj.com) to become an anti-racist community organization that fosters an inclusive environment for all staff, board members, volunteers, clients, and donors. RisewithKJ’s worked with our leadership team to create a DEI roadmap. Employees were asked to complete an anonymous race equity assessment that established a baseline for our DEI work going forward. The assessment asked about their work experiences, the organization’s culture, and gaps in leadership development. The assessment’s results highlighted where we needed to raise awareness, deepen cultural humility, and build DEI competencies. RisewithKJ has provided three different learning tracks for us - race equity basics, equitable supervision, and DEI Committee support.
Source: Nonprofit submitted responses
Mobilizing for Mission
The nonprofit provides evidence of leadership through focusing externally and mobilizing resources for the mission.
This organization mobilizes for mission in the following ways:
Strategic Partnerships
Networks of Collective Impact Efforts
Thought Leadership
Raising Awareness
Community Building
Policy Advocacy
What are this organization’s external mobilizaton efforts?
In addition to lifting our hammers, we must also lift our voices in support of adequate shelter. Building is part of the solution, but less visible aspects of housing like laws, regulations, systems, and rules about land and development are critical components in eliminating barriers to safe, healthy, affordable housing. From our deep understanding of housing and its central role in providing opportunities for families, we work to reform policies and laws in collaborative, nonpartisan ways. In June 2019, South Puget Sound Habitat joined Habitat affiliates across the country in a five-year nationwide advocacy campaign, Cost of Home. We commit to mobilizing our partners, volunteers, and community members across the US to find solutions and create policies that will allow 10 million individuals to meet their most basic needs.
Source: Nonprofit submitted responses
Story of Adaptability
The nonprofit has an opportunity to tell the story of how the organization adapted to tremendous external changes in the last year.
The COVID-19 pandemic for South Puget Sound Habitat has meant slower construction schedules. Pre-COVID, we relied on volunteers for many construction tasks. However, due to safety regulations, mainly Habitat construction staff and sub-contractors have been allowed on our build sites. Homeowners and their families have been able to be on-site to complete their sweat equity hours while following COVID-19 safety precautions. As restrictions have started lifting, South Puget Sound Habitat has been able to invite more volunteers back on the construction site and that will help projects move forward at a quicker pace. It has also been harder to find and schedule sub-contractors, and the city’s design reviews are taking longer. Again, we are hopeful that fewer restrictions will mean getting this work done easier. Lumber prices have gone up dramatically. Trusses went from average of $3,942 to $5,279 - an increase of 34%. Framing costs for homes completed in 2020 (pre-COVID) averaged $12,458 and in February 2021, the average framing cost was $18,287 - an increase of 46%. A recent analysis of material cost increases reflects an average increase of 36% per home (approximately $37,423). Other examples: • Drywall: Budgeted at $9,500, actual cost $17,750 – increased 87% • Insulation: Budgeted at $3,500, actual cost $5,700 – increased 63% • Windows: Budgeted at $2,000, actual cost $2,672 – increased 34%
Source: Nonprofit submitted responses
Additional Information
Unscored
This beta feature is currently viewable only on desktop or tablet screens. Check back later for updates.
Organization Leadership
Carly Colgan
Chief Executive Officer
John Hutchings
President
Previous: Leadership & Adaptability
Culture & Community
This score provides an assessment of the organization's culture and connectedness to the community it serves. Learn more about how and why we rate Culture & Community.
Culture & Community Score
100
out of 100
South Puget Sound Habitat for Humanity has earned a passing score. This score has no effect on the organization's Star Rating. The organization provided data about how it listens to constituents (Constituent Feedback) and its Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI) practices (see report below).
The Culture & Community Beacon is comprised of the following metrics:
Constituent Feedback: 100/100 (30% of beacon score)
Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion: 100/100 (70% of beacon score)
Culture & Community Report
100
of 100 points
This beta feature is currently viewable only on desktop or tablet screens. Check back later for updates.
Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
100/100 points
70% of beacon score
This organization's score of 100 is a passing score. The organization reported that it is implementing 11 diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) practices. Charity Navigator believes nonprofit organizations implementing effective DEI policies and practices can enhance a nonprofit's decision-making, staff motivation, innovation, and effectiveness.
View this organization's DEI Strategies
Methodology
We are utilizing data collected by Candid to document and assess the DEI practices implemented by the organization. Nonprofit organizations are encouraged to fill out the Equity Strategies section of their Candid profiles to receive a rating.
Learn more about the methodology.
Constituent Feedback
100/100 points
30% of beacon score
This organization reported that it is collecting feedback from the constituents and/or communities it serves. Charity Navigator believes nonprofit organizations that engage in inclusive practices, such as collecting feedback from the people and communities they serve, may be more effective.
View this organization's Constituent Feedback Practices
Methodology
We've partnered with Candid to survey organizations about their feedback practices. Nonprofit organizations can fill out the How We Listen section of their Candid profile to receive a rating.
Learn more about the methodology.
Analysis and Research
Like the overall Encompass Rating System, the Culture & Community Beacon is designed to evolve as metrics are developed and ready for integration. Below you can find more information about the metrics we currently evaluate in this beacon and their relevance to nonprofit performance.
Constituent Feedback
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
