Your donation attempt encountered a problem. Please refresh the page to try again.
You're faster than our page! Give the page a little longer to finish loading and try your donation again.
San Francisco CA | IRS ruling year: 1997 | EIN: 94-3155886
Organization Mission
Founded in 1992, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners (BCPP) is the leading national science-based, policy and advocacy organization focused on preventing breast cancer ... (More)
Founded in 1992, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners (BCPP) is the leading national science-based, policy and advocacy organization focused on preventing breast cancer by eliminating our exposure to toxic chemicals and radiation. BCPP works in close partnership with leaders from the environmental health and justice communities, scientists, health care and business professionals, policymakers and individuals to eliminate toxic chemicals and radiation linked to the disease. Through education, legislative advocacy and corporate accountability campaigns, BCPP occupies a unique niche at the nexus of environmental health, women's health and breast cancer prevention. Visit www.bcpp.org to learn more. (Less)
Good
This charity's score is 80%, earning it a Three-Star rating. If this organization aligns with your passions and values, you can give with confidence.
This overall score is calculated from multiple beacon scores, weighted as follows: 80% Accountability & Finance, 10% Leadership & Adaptability, 10% Culture & Community. Learn more about our criteria and methodology.
We recognize that not all metrics and beacons equally predict a charity’s success. The percentage each beacon contributes to the organization’s overall rating depends on the number of beacons an organization has earned.
Use the tool below to select different beacons to see how the weighting shifts when only one, two, or three beacons are earned.
| Date Published | Form 990 FYE | Overall Score | Overall Rating |
| Rating Version: 2.1 | |||
| 6/1/2021 | 2019 | 76.98 |  |
| 2/1/2020 | 2018 | 79.69 | |
| 2/1/2019 | 2017 | 90.00 |  |
| 2/1/2018 | 2016 | 88.13 | |
| 12/22/2017 | 2016 | 87.80 | |
This organization received multiple star ratings within this fiscal year, due to an update to its Accountability and Transparency data and/or the receipt of an amended Form 990. | |||
| 4/1/2017 | 2015 | 86.10 | |
| 6/1/2016 | 2014 | 84.19 | |
| Rating Version: 2.0 | |||
| 11/1/2015 | 2014 | 84.50 | |
| 10/1/2014 | 2013 | 79.06 | |
| 9/1/2013 | 2012 | 81.57 | |
| 9/1/2012 | 2011 | 89.44 | |
| 10/1/2011 | 2010 | 81.65 | |
| 9/20/2011 | 2009 | 88.04 | |
| Rating Version: 1.0 | |||
| 11/24/2010 | 2009 | 79.56 | |
| 10/1/2009 | 2008 | 85.04 | |
| 11/1/2008 | 2007 | 87.68 | |
| 11/1/2007 | 2006 | 88.29 | |
| 11/1/2006 | 2005 | 88.06 | |
| 4/1/2005 | 2004 | 73.83 | |
| 4/1/2004 | 2003 | 64.63 |  |
The IRS is significantly delayed in processing nonprofits' annual tax filings (Forms 990). As a result, the Accountability & Finance score for Breast Cancer Prevention Partners is outdated and the overall rating may not be representative of its current operations. Please check with the charity directly for any questions you may have.
Breast Cancer Prevention Partners has earned a 77% for the Accountability & Finance beacon. See the metrics below for more information.
This beacon provides an assessment of a charity's financial health (financial efficiency, sustainability, and trustworthiness) and its commitment to governance practices and policies.
This Accountability & Finance score represents IRS Form 990 data up until FY 2019, which is the most recent Form 990 currently available to us.
Learn more
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
Not Applicable
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990 that the organization has these governance practices in place.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990
| Independent Voting Board Members ... (More) The presence of an independent governing body is strongly recommended by many industry professionals to allow for full deliberation and diversity of thinking on governance and other organizational matters. Our analysts check the Form 990 to determine if the independent Board members are a voting majority and also at least five in number. (Less) | |
| No Material Diversion of Assets ... (More) A diversion of assets – any unauthorized conversion or use of the organization's assets other than for the organization's authorized purposes, including but not limited to embezzlement or theft – can seriously call into question a charity's financial integrity. We check the charity's last two Forms 990 to see if the charity has reported any diversion of assets. If the charity does report a diversion, then we check to see if it complied with the Form 990 instructions by describing what happened and its corrective action. This metric will be assigned to one of the following categories:
| |
| Audited Financials Prepared by Independent Accountant ... (More) Audited financial statements provide important information about financial accountability and accuracy. They should be prepared by an independent accountant with oversight from an audit committee. (It is not necessary that the audit committee be a separate committee. Often at smaller charities, it falls within the responsibilities of the finance committee or the executive committee.) The committee provides an important oversight layer between the management of the organization, which is responsible for the financial information reported, and the independent accountant, who reviews the financials and issues an opinion based on its findings. We check the charity's Form 990 reporting to see if it meets this criteria.
| |
| Does Not Provide Loan(s) to or Receive Loan(s) From Related Parties ... (More) Making loans to related parties such as key officers, staff, or Board members, is not standard practice in the sector as it may divert the charity's funds away from its charitable mission and can lead to real and perceived conflict-of-interest problems. This practice is discouraged by sector trade groups which point to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when they call for charities to refrain from making loans to directors and executives. And the IRS is concerned enough with the practice that it requires charities to disclose on their Form 990 any loans to or from current and former officers, directors, trustees, key employees, and other "disqualified persons." Furthermore, some state laws go so far as to prohibit loans to board members and officers. And although employees and trustees are permitted to make loans to charities, this practice can also result in real and/or perceived conflict of interest problems for the charity. Furthermore, it is problematic because it is an indicator that the organization is not financially secure. (Less) | |
| Documents Board Meeting Minutes ... (More) An official record of the events that take place during a board meeting ensures that a contemporaneous document exists for future reference. Charities are not required to make their Board meeting minutes available to the public. As such, we are not able to review and critique their minutes. For this performance metric, we are checking to see if the charity reports on its Form 990 that it does keep those minutes. In the future, we will also track and rate whether or not a charity keeps minutes for its committee meetings. (Less) | |
| Distributes 990 to Board Before Filing ... (More) Providing copies of the Form to the governing body in advance of filing is considered a best practice, as it allows for thorough review by the individuals charged with overseeing the organization. The Form 990 asks the charity to disclose whether or not it has followed this best practice. If the charity has not distributed its Form 990 to the board before filing, then we deduct 4 points from its Accountability and Transparency score. (Less) | |
| Does not Compensate Board Members ... (More) The IRS requires that any compensation paid to members of the charity's governing body be listed on the Form 990. Furthermore, all members of the governing body need to be listed whether or not they are compensated. It is not unusual for some members of the board to have compensation listed. The executive director of the organization frequently has a seat on the board, for instance, and is compensated for being a full time staff member. However, it is rare for a charity to compensate individuals only for serving on its Board of Directors. Although this sort of board compensation is not illegal, it is not considered a best practice. (Less) | |
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990, or for some metrics on the charity's website, that the organization has these policies in place.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990 and organization's website
| Conflict of Interest ... (More) Such a policy protects the organization, and by extension those it serves, when it is considering entering into a transaction that may benefit the private interest of an officer or director of the organization. Charities are not required to share their conflict of interest policies with the public. Although we can not evaluate the substance of its policy, we can tell you if the charity has one in place based on the information it reports on its Form 990. If the charity does not have a Conflict of Interest policy, then we deduct 4 points from its Accountability and Transparency score. (Less) | |
| Whistleblower ... (More) This policy outlines procedures for handling employee complaints, as well as a confidential way for employees to report any financial mismanagement. Here we are reporting on the existence of a policy as reported by the charity on its Form 990. (Less) | |
| Records Retention and Destruction ... (More) Such a policy establishes guidelines for handling, backing up, archiving and destruction of documents. These guidelines foster good record keeping procedures that promotes data integrity. Here we are reporting on the existence of a policy as reported by the charity on its Form 990. If the charity does not have a Records Retention and Destruction Policy, then we deduct 4 points from its Accountability and Transparency score. (Less) | |
| CEO Compensation Process ... (More) This process indicates that the organization has a documented policy that it follows year after year. The policy should indicate that an objective and independent review process of the CEO's compensation has been conducted which includes benchmarking against comparable organizations. We check to be sure that the charity has reported on its Form 990 its process for determining its CEO pay. (Less) | |
| Donor Privacy ... (More) Donors can be reluctant to contribute to a charity when their name, address, or other basic information may become part of donor lists that are exchanged or sold, resulting in an influx of charitable solicitations from other organizations. Our analysts check the charity's website to see if the organization has a donor privacy policy in place and what it does and does not cover. Privacy policies are assigned to one of the following categories:
The privacy policy must be specific to donor information. A general website policy which references "visitor" or "user" personal information will not suffice. A policy that refers to donor information collected on the website is also not sufficient as the policy must be comprehensive and applicable to both online and offline donors. The existence of a privacy policy of any type does not prohibit the charity itself from contacting the donor for informational, educational, or solicitation purposes. (Less) | |
Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990, or for some metrics on the charity's website, that the organization makes this information easily accessible.
Sources Include: IRS Form 990 and organization's website
| CEO Salary Listed on 990 ... (More) Charities are required to list their CEO's name and compensation on the Form 990. Our analysts check to be sure that the charities complied with the Form 990 instructions and included this information in their filing. (Less) | |
| Board of Directors Listed on Website ... (More) Our analysts check to see if the charity lists Board members on its website. Publishing this information enables donors and other stakeholders to ascertain the make up of the charity's governing body. This enables stakeholders to report concerns to the Board. Charity Navigator does not cross-check the Board members listed on the website with that reported on the Form 990, because the latter often isn't available until more than a year after the charity's fiscal year ends. In that time, the charity's Board members may have changed, and the charity typically reflects those more recent changes on the website. (Less) | |
| Key Staff Listed on Website ... (More) It is important for donors and other stakeholders to know who runs the organization day-to-day. Charity Navigator does not cross-check the leadership listed on the website with that reported on the Form 990 because the latter often isn't available until more than a year after the charity's fiscal year ends. In that time, the charity's leadership may have changed and the charity typically reflects those more recent changes on the website. In other words, since the Form 990 isn't especially timely, it can not be used to verify the leadership information published on the charity's site. (Less) | |
| Audited Financial Statements Listed on Website ... (More) We check the charity's website to see if it has published its audited financial statements for the fiscal year represented by the most recently filed IRS Form 990. It is important for donors to have easy access to this financial report to help determine if the organization is managing its financial resources well. We currently rate charities on whether or not they publish their audit on their website. (Less) | |
| Form 990 Available on Website ... (More) We check the charity's website to see if it has published its most recently filed IRS Form 990 (a direct link to the charity's 990 on an external site is sufficient). It is important for donors to have easy access to this financial report to help determine if the organization is managing its financial resources well. (Less) | |
Full CreditPartial CreditNo CreditNot ApplicableLiabilities to Assets Ratio - 42.30% - 2.5/10 ptsLiabilities to Assets Ratio - 42.30% - 2.5/10 pts
The Liabilities to Assets Ratio is determined by Total Liabilities divided by Total Assets (most recent 990).
Part of our goal in rating the financial performance of charities is to help donors assess the financial capacity and sustainability of a charity. As do organizations in other sectors, charities must be mindful of their management of total liabilites in relation to their total assets. This ratio is an indicator of an organization’s solvency and or long term sustainability. Dividing a charity's total liabilities by its total assets yields this percentage.
Source: IRS Form 990
Working Capital Ratio - 0.16 years - 2.5/10 ptsWorking Capital Ratio - 0.16 years - 2.5/10 pts
Determines how long a charity could sustain its level of spending using its net available assets, or working capital, as reported on its most recently filed Form 990. We include in a charity's working capital unrestricted and temporarily restricted net assets, and exclude permanently restricted net assets. Dividing these net available assets in the most recent year by a charity's average total expenses, yields the working capital ratio. We calculate the charity's average total expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Fundraising Efficiency - $0.16 - 7.5/10 ptsFundraising Efficiency - $0.16 - 7.5/10 pts
The amount spent to raise $1 in charitable contributions. To calculate a charity's fundraising efficiency, we divide its average fundraising expenses by the average total contributions it receives. We calculate the charity's average expenses and average contributions over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Administrative Expense Ratio - 10.00% - 10/10 ptsAdministrative Expense Ratio - 10.00% - 10/10 pts
As reported by charities on their IRS Form 990, this measure reflects what percent of its total budget a charity spends on overhead, administrative staff and associated costs, and organizational meetings. Dividing a charity's average administrative expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Fundraising Expense Ratio - 13.70% - 7.5/10 ptsFundraising Expense Ratio - 13.70% - 7.5/10 pts
This measure reflects what a charity spends to raise money. Fundraising expenses can include campaign printing, publicity, mailing, and staffing and costs incurred in soliciting donations, memberships, and grants. Dividing a charity's average fundraising expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Program Expense Ratio - 76.09% - 7.45/10 ptsProgram Expense Ratio - 76.09% - 7.45/10 pts
The Program Expense Ratio is determined by Program Expenses divided by Total Expense (average of most recent three 990s).
This measure reflects the percent of its total expenses a charity spends on the programs and services it exists to deliver. Dividing a charity's average program expenses by its average total functional expenses yields this percentage. We calculate the charity's average expenses over its three most recent fiscal years.
Source: IRS Form 990
Program Expense Growth - -5.70% - 0/10 ptsProgram Expense Growth - -5.70% - 0/10 pts
Organizations that demonstrate consistent annual growth in program expenses are able to outpace inflation and thus sustain their programs year to year. These organizations also supply givers with greater confidence by maintaining broad public support for their programs. We compute the average annual growth of program expenses using the following formula: [(Yn/Y0)(1/n)]-1, where Y0 is a charity's program expenses in the first year of the interval analyzed, Yn is the charity's program expenses in the most recent year, and n is the interval of years passed between Y0 and Yn.
Source: IRS Form 990
This chart displays the trend of revenue and expenses over the past several years for this organization, as reported on their IRS Form 990.
Presented here are this organizations key compensated staff members as identified by our analysts. This compensation data includes salary, cash bonuses and expense accounts and is displayed exactly how it is reported to the IRS. The amounts do not include nontaxable benefits, deferred compensation, or other amounts not reported on Form W-2. In some cases, these amounts may include compensation from related organizations. Read the IRS policies for compensation reporting
Amanda Heier, President & CEO
$141,036 (4.91% of Total Expenses)
Current CEO and Board Chair can be found in the Leadership & Adaptability report below.
Source: IRS Form 990 (page 7), filing year 2019
Below are some key data points from the Exempt Organization IRS Business Master File (BMF) for this organization. Learn more about the BMF on the IRS website
Foundation Status:
Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (BMF foundation code: 15)
Affiliation:
Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary (i.e., not affiliated with a National, Regional, or Geographic grouping of organizations). (BMF affiliation code: 3)
The Form 990 is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage finance and accountability data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to search for this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website (if any are available). Simply enter the organization's name (Breast Cancer Prevention Partners) or EIN (943155886) in the 'Search Term' field.
This organization was impacted by COVID-19 in a way that effected their financial health in 2020. This normally would have reduced their star rating. Due to the unprecedented nature of the pandemic, we give charities such as this one the opportunity to share the story of COVID's impact on them, and doing this pauses our revision of their rating. Charities may submit their own pandemic responses through their nonprofit portal.
Breast Cancer Prevention Partners reported being impacted by COVID-19 in the following ways:
Program Delivery
Fundraising Capacity
Revenue
Balance Sheet
How COVID-19 impacted the organization's operations financially:
Donations initially took a big hit, declining 75% in the initial months. Three in-person fundraising events were canceled or postponed, and virtual events filled out the remainder of the year. In addition, we also saw declines in foundation and corporate giving, resulting in a total of $1 million loss in revenue. Our year-end fundraising was stronger than anticipated, and we ended 2020 with approximately 25% less revenue than an average year. We did receive a PPP loan to maintain staff levels, which was forgiven in its entirety in December 2020, and also received an EIDL loan with a 30-year term.
How COVID-19 impacted the organization's delivery of programs:
We were forced to cancel several signature in-person fundraising events. In response, we began offering virtual events for the first time, including a virtual donor salon, an online film festival, an educational discussion series, and two virtual ‘outdoor challenges.’ Our Program & Policy team consistently work with a team of D.C. and Sacramento political consultants. However, due to the sharp decrease in revenue, we were forced to lay off all consultants – leaving us essentially short 5 policy staff members. Fortunately, though working with less resources than usual, BCPP rose to the challenge and accomplished a lot: all three of our CA bills were prioritized by their bill authors and signed into law; we launched a global campaign against Johnson and Johnson, demanding the corporate giant halt international sales of their toxic talc-based baby powder; we also finalized a 400-page report and launched our statewide plan for breast cancer primary prevention, Paths to Prevention.
How this organization adapted to changing conditions caused by COVID-19:
We created virtual versions of two of our signature, outdoor, in-person fundraising events: Peak Hike for Prevention and New England Peaks for Prevention. We also developed brand new virtual platforms to deliver programmatic and fundraising activities: a new “Changemakers’ Chat” virtual discussion series, a virtual congressional briefing, an online film screening of LUNAFEST, educational webinars to launch Paths to Prevention, and so on. We also performed a mid-year reevaluation of our budget and cut costs where possible (i.e., subscriptions, services, etc.).
Innovations the organization intends to continue permanently after the pandemic:
Some of our virtual outdoor events were more successful than we anticipated. For example, our virtual Peak Hike (usually based in the Bay Area) saw a 50/50 ratio of registrants from both California and out of state. Looking forward, we will offer a hybrid version of Peak Hike (in-person and virtual) to expand our reach to supporters outside of California. Our virtual educational series, “Changemakers’ Chat,” was a new and engaging way to tie our work to current issues and dive deeper into our scientific and business partners and allowed BCPP supporters to learn more about our work. We anticipate conducting similar education programming in the future. Our entire staff began working remotely. We have seen an increase in flexibility and streamlining of work and anticipate continuing to offer remote work options.
Not Currently Scored
Breast Cancer Prevention Partners cannot currently be evaluated by our Impact & Results methodology because either (A) it is eligible, but we have not yet received data; (B) we have not yet developed an algorithm to estimate its programmatic impact; (C) its programs are not direct services; or (D) it is not heavily reliant on contributions from individual donors.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
Learn More
Breast Cancer Prevention Partners reported its three largest programs on its FY 2019 Form 990 as:
Spent in most recent FY
Percent of program expenses
Science, Public Education & Engagement
Spent in most recent FY
Percent of program expenses
Federal and State Policy and Programs
Spent in most recent FY
Percent of program expenses
Business Accountability
Breast Cancer Prevention Partners has earned a 85% for the Culture & Community beacon. See the metrics below for more information.
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's culture and connectedness to the community it serves.
Learn more
Full CreditPartial CreditNo CreditNot ApplicableConstituent Feedback - No Data Available - UnscoredConstituent Feedback - No Data Available - Unscored
Constituent Feedback and Listening Practice data are not available for this organization. Charity Navigator believes nonprofit organizations that engage in inclusive practices, such as collecting feedback from the people and communities they serve, may be more effective.
Equity Practices - Data Available - 85/100 ptsEquity Practices - Data Available - 85/100 pts
100% of beacon score
This organization's score of 85 is a passing score. The organization reported that it is implementing 5 Equity Practices. Charity Navigator believes nonprofit organizations implementing effective equity policies and practices can enhance a nonprofit's decision-making, staff motivation, innovation, and effectiveness.
Equity Practices (4/7) | |
|---|---|
We review compensation data across the organization (and by staff levels) to identify disparities by race. | |
We ask team members to identify racial disparities in their programs and/or portfolios. | |
We analyze disaggregated data and root causes of race disparities that impact the organization/'s programs, portfolios, and the populations served. | |
We disaggregate data to adjust programming goals to keep pace with changing needs of the communities we support. | |
We employ non-traditional ways of gathering feedback on programs and trainings, which may include interviews, roundtables, and external reviews with/by community stakeholders. | |
We disaggregate data by demographics, including race, in every policy and program measured | |
We have long-term strategic plans and measurable goals for creating a culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization. | |
Equity Policies and Procedures (1/7) | |
|---|---|
We use a vetting process to identify vendors and partners that share our commitment to race equity. | |
We have a promotion process that anticipates and mitigates implicit and explicit biases about people of color serving in leadership positions. | |
We seek individuals from various race backgrounds for board and executive director/CEO positions within our organization. | |
We have community representation at the board level, either on the board itself or through a community advisory board. | |
We help senior leadership understand how to be inclusive leaders with learning approaches that emphasize reflection, iteration, and adaptability. | |
We measure and then disaggregate job satisfaction and retention data by race, function, level, and/or team. | |
We engage everyone, from the board to staff levels of the organization, in race equity work and ensure that individuals understand their roles in creating culture such that one’s race identity has no influence on how they fare within the organization. | |
Breast Cancer Prevention Partners has earned a 100% for the Leadership & Adaptability beacon. See the metrics below for more information.
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's leadership capacity, strategic thinking and planning, and ability to innovate or respond to changes in constituent demand/need or other relevant social and economic conditions to achieve the organization's mission.
Learn more
Full CreditPartial CreditNo CreditNot ApplicableMission - 10/10 ptsMission - 10/10 pts
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's mission
Founded in 1992, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners (BCPP) is the leading national science-based, policy and advocacy organization focused on preventing breast cancer by eliminating our exposure to toxic chemicals and radiation linked to the disease. BCPP works in close partnership with leaders from the environmental health and justice communities, scientists, health care and business professionals, policymakers, and individuals to eliminate toxic chemicals and radiation linked to the disease. Through education, legislative advocacy, and corporate accountability campaigns, BCPP occupies a unique niche at the nexus of environmental health, women's health, and breast cancer prevention. Visit www.bcpp.org to learn more.
Vision - 10/10 ptsVision - 10/10 pts
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization’s vision.
As a result of our work, we envision a world in which: • We live without fear of losing our breasts or our lives as a result of what we’ve eaten, touched or breathed because the environmental causes of breast cancer have been identified and eliminated. • Most breast cancer can be prevented, while safe detection and treatment of the disease are the standard and available to all. • We have succeeded in informing and mobilizing a public that is unrelenting and holds government and business accountable for contaminating our bodies and our environment. • Public policy protects our health and is guided by the principle that credible evidence of harm rather than proof of harm is sufficient to mandate policy changes in the public’s best interest. • We have done justice to the women and men whose struggle and dedication inspired our resolve.
Source: Nonprofit submitted responses
Goals - 20/20 ptsGoals - 20/20 pts
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking and goal setting through sharing their most important strategic goals.
Goal One: Elevate the science linking toxic chemicals and radiation with breast cancer in the national research conversation.
Goal Type: This goal reflects our commitment to further our advocacy work for our organization and or cause area.
Goal Two: Develop, prioritize, and enact policies that reduce or eliminate the types and amounts of toxic chemicals and exposures to radiation that contribute to the development of breast cancer.
Goal Type: This goal reflects our commitment to further our advocacy work for our organization and or cause area.
Goal Three: Generate a diversified, robust, and sustainable revenue approach that supports the work of the current and future initiatives.
Goal Type: Invest in the capacity of our organization (financial, management, technical, etc.).
Leadership Development - 15/15 ptsLeadership Development - 15/15 pts
The nonprofit provides evidence of investment in leadership development
Each year we allocate funds and invest in professional development for our staff. Each staff member is encouraged look out for professional development opportunities that interest them (online courses, conferences, workshops, etc.). BCPP provides flexibility and funds (if needed) to the staff member to participate in the opportunity. For example, last year BCPP’s Director of Development participated in the 2020 Responsive Nonprofit Summit - a two-day virtual learning experience for forward-thinking nonprofit fundraisers and leaders, hosted by Virtuous.
Mobilizing for Mission - 15/15 ptsMobilizing for Mission - 15/15 pts
The nonprofit provides evidence of leadership through focusing externally and mobilizing resources for the mission.
Strategic Partnerships
Networks of Collective Impact Efforts
Thought Leadership
Raising Awareness
Policy Advocacy
Respectful and authentic partnerships with diverse groups and individuals is critical to fulfilling our mission. BCPP has collaborated successfully with community groups, national non-profit organizations, government agencies, and businesses nationally and internationally. Through our science leadership, we highlight the growing body of scientific research linking environmental factors to breast cancer. We guest speak at events, present at scientific conferences, publish consumer reports, and work with academic institutions to produce research papers. We participate in several coalitions and groups whose missions align closely with our work (ex: Federal Food and Chemical Alliance). We regularly share updates, actions, news, and provide engagement opportunities to our supporters through social media – Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc. We also guest on interviews and reach out to journalists that cover issues in our field.
Adaptability Story - 30/30 ptsAdaptability Story - 30/30 pts
The nonprofit has an opportunity to tell the story of how the organization adapted to tremendous external changes in the last year.
Breast Cancer Prevention Partner’s financial health and stability were deeply impacted by the pandemic. Forced to cancel or drastically modify key annual fundraising events and absorb overall declines in individual, foundation, and corporate giving, we measured $1 million in lost revenue. However, through the loyalty of longtime BCPP supporters and our ability to pivot through new environments, we were able to overcome many of our obstacles and make huge strides towards preventing breast cancer. We adjusted our external events to the new environment. We created virtual versions of two of our signature, outdoor, in-person fundraising events: Peak Hike for Prevention and New England Peaks for Prevention. We also developed brand new virtual platforms to deliver programmatic and fundraising activities: a new “Changemakers’ Chat” virtual discussion series, a virtual congressional briefing, an online film screening of LUNAFEST, educational webinars to launch Paths to Prevention, and so on. In foundations, we applied, advocated for, and received emergency grants from several longtime funders and a $300k loan from the Small Business Administration PPP program, bringing our total 2020 income to $2.2 million. We also performed a mid-year reevaluation of our budget and cut costs where possible (i.e., subscriptions, services, etc.). In addition, our staff adapted quickly to remote working, full utilizing our Teams and Zoom software to bring our internal capacity together and connect with outside networks.
Impact & Results
Accountability & Finance
Culture & Community
Leadership & Adaptability
The Giving Basket is having some issues. If you wish to donate, please refresh the page. If the problem persists contact us.
Cart ID: Not Assigned
The Giving Basket is having some issues. If you wish to donate, please refresh the page. If the problem persists contact us.
Cart ID: Not Assigned
