Mission: SEE PART III, LINE 1.

Evidence Action Inc. is a 501(c)(3) organization, with an IRS ruling year of 2013, and donations are tax-deductible.

Is this your nonprofit? Access the Nonprofit Portal to submit data and download your rating toolkit.


Contact Information

  www.evidenceaction.org

 1101 K ST NW STE 900
Washington DC 20005-4264



...  ...  ...  ...  

Encompass Rating System by Charity Navigator


Overall Score

100

out of 100

This charity's score is a passing score.
This overall score is calculated from multiple beacon scores: 35% Finance & Accountability, 55% Impact & Results, and 10% Leadership & Adaptability


Learn about the Encompass Rating System: Overview | FAQ | Release Notes


This organization is potentially eligible for a Charity Navigator Star Rating. Vote Now to request to have our analyst team rate Evidence Action Inc. for a Star Rating. The organization currently has 1 vote.

Back to Top

...   Finance & Accountability


This score provides an assessment of a nonprofit's financial health (stability, efficiency and sustainability) and its commitment to governance practices and policies.


Finance & Accountability Score

100

out of 100

The score earned by Evidence Action Inc. is a passing score

This V4 of the Finance & Accountability Score provides a baseline measure of an organization’s health including the indicators listed in the report below.

This score represents Form 990 data from 2019, the latest year published by the IRS.



Back to Top

Finance & Accountability Report

100

of 100 points

This beta feature is currently viewable only on desktop or tablet screens. Check back later for updates.

Program Expense

Program Expense Ratio

89.11%

Higher effect on score

More data  


The Program Expense Ratio is determined by Program Expenses divided by Total Expense (average of most recent three 990s). This measure reflects the percent of its total expenses a charity spends on the programs and services it exists to deliver.


Program Expense Percentage

Amount of Credit Received

70% or higherFull Credit
60% - 69.9%Partial Credit
Below 50%Zero Points for Both Program Expense percentage AND Liabilities to Assets

Source: IRS Form 990

Board Composition

6/7 Independent

Higher effect on score


Charity Navigator looks for at least 3 board members, with more than 50% of those members identified as independent (not salaried).


The presence of an independent governing body is strongly recommended by many industry professionals to allow for full deliberation and diversity of thinking on governance and other organizational matters.


Source: IRS Form 990

Independent Audit or Financial Review

Audited

Higher effect on score


An Audit, Review, or Compilation provides important information about financial accountability and accuracy. Organizations are scored based on their Total Revenue Amount:

Total Revenue Amount

Expectation to Receive Credit

$1 million or higherExpected to complete an audit
$250,000 - $1 millionExpected to complete an audit, review, or compilation
Less than $250,000No expectation (removed from scoring methodology)

Source: IRS Form 990

Liabilities to Assets Ratio

1.79%

Lower effect on score


The Liabilities to Assets Ratio is determined by Total Liabilities divided by Total Assets (most recent 990). This ratio is an indicator of an organization’s solvency and/or long-term sustainability.

Liabilities to Assets Ratio

Amount of Credit Received

Less than 50%Full Credit
50% - 59.9%Partial Credit
60% or moreNo Credit

Source: IRS Form 990

Website

Listed

Lower effect on score


Charity Navigator looks for a website on the Form 990 as an accountability and transparency metric.


Nonprofits act in the public trust and reporting publicly on activities is an important component.


Source: IRS Form 990

Conflict of Interest Policy

Listed

Lower effect on score


Charity Navigator looks for the existence of a conflict of interest policy on the Form 990 as an accountability and transparency measure.


This policy protects the organization and by extension those it serves, when it is considering entering into a transaction that may benefit the private interest of an officer, director and/or key employee of the organization.


Source: IRS Form 990

Board Meeting Minutes

Documented

Lower effect on score


Charity Navigator looks to confirm on the Form 990 that the organization has this process in place as an accountability and transparency measure.


An official record of the events that take place during a board meeting ensures that a contemporaneous document exists for future reference.


Source: IRS Form 990

Document Retention and Destruction

Listed

Lower effect on score


Charity Navigator looks for the existence of a document retention and destruction policy per the Form 990 as an accountability and transparency measure.


This policy establishes guidelines for the handling, backing up, archiving and destruction of documents. These guidelines foster good record keeping procedures that promote data integrity.


Source: IRS Form 990

Whistleblower Policy

Listed

Lower effect on score


Charity Navigator looks for the existence of a whistleblower policy per the Form 990 as an accountability and transparency measure.


This policy outlines procedures for handling employee complaints, as well as a confidential way for employees to report financial or other types of mismanagement.


Source: IRS Form 990

Additional Information

Unscored

This beta feature is currently viewable only on desktop or tablet screens. Check back later for updates.

Total Revenue and Expenses

Total Revenue and Expenses

This chart displays the trend of revenue and expenses over the past several years for this organization, as reported on their IRS Form 990.

Salary of Key Persons

Presented here are up to five of this organization's highest compensated employees. This compensation data includes salary, cash bonuses, and expense accounts and is displayed exactly how it is reported to the IRS. The amounts include salary, cash bonuses, and expense accounts. The amounts do not include nontaxable benefits, deferred compensation, or other amounts not reported on Form W-2. Read the IRS policies for compensation reporting



KANIKA BAHL, CEO

$307,533


JOHN DE WET, CHIEF FIN. & ADMIN. OFF/SEC/TREAS.

$158,656


KAREN LEVY, SR. DIR., INNOVATION

$148,802


GRACE HOLLISTER, CH. ENG. OFF./GLOBAL DEWORMING LEAD

$146,201


BRETT SEDGEWICK, DIR., DEWORM THE WORLD INITIATIVE

$128,060


Source: IRS Form 990 (page 7), filing year 2019

Business Master File Data

Below are some key data points from the Exempt Organization IRS Business Master File (BMF) for this organization. Learn more about the BMF on the IRS website


Activities:

Activity data not reported from the IRS


Foundation Status:

Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public   170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (BMF foundation code: 15)


Affiliation:

Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary (i.e., not affiliated with a National, Regional, or Geographic grouping of organizations). (BMF affiliation code: 3)

Data Sources: IRS Forms 990

The Form 990 is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage finance and accountability data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to view this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website (if any are available).

Pandemic Response

Due to the unprecedented nature of the pandemic, we give charities such as this one the opportunity to share the story of COVID's impact on them. Charities may submit their own pandemic responses through their nonprofit portal.


Evidence Action Inc. reported being impacted by COVID-19 in the following ways:
  • Program Delivery

  • Revenue

  • Staffing

  • Administrative Capacity

  • Balance Sheet


How COVID-19 impacted the organization's operations financially:

The organization’s financials were impacted in multiple ways, though we were able to adapt under these difficult circumstances. One of the main adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic was to our Deworm the World Initiative, which helps governments deworm children using a school-based delivery model. With schools closed for most of the year due to lockdowns, program activities and expenditures dropped by approximately 35%. This led directly to a lower recovery of indirect costs, which are critical to paying for the operations of the organization. Despite this, we managed to make up this gap from reserves and retained our full staff complement throughout the year. Throughout the pandemic, Evidence Action’s donors remain supportive. In mid-2020 we were able to raise urgent funding that provided critical supplies to help prevent the spread of COVID in communities where Dispensers for Safe Water operates, and giving from individuals increased in 2020 compared to 2019.


How COVID-19 impacted the organization's delivery of programs:

Our Dispensers for Safe Water program adapted to ensure continued access to safe water by distributing enough chlorine for several months. We also carried out emergency distributions of soap, disinfectant, and hygiene education materials by our community-elected volunteers to help prevent COVID. Our Deworm the World Initiative also adapted significantly. In Pakistan, we worked with several states to support a new round of deworming treatments. In Kenya, following school closures, we helped the government restart school-based deworming in early 2021 and successfully prototyped a new method to validate deworming coverage with social distancing. In Nigeria, we are working with multiple states to restart school-based deworming treatments. In India, we helped shift school-based deworming programs to community-based delivery to reach children at home, along with providing iron and folic acid supplementation. We also supported states with data analysis, communications, and contact tracing.


How this organization adapted to changing conditions caused by COVID-19:

In addition to adapting our programs to accommodate lockdowns and school closures, we undertook a tremendous amount of risk analysis and planning to determine how best to keep our teams safe while ensuring continued program impact, constituting a global rapid response team that met regularly to discuss emerging program and organizational risks, and develop and monitor related action plans. We increased flexibility in leave policies for all staff globally, providing for additional COVID-related leave. As a global organization, many of our staff are accustomed to working virtually. We therefore shifted quickly into remote work across many of the countries where we operate, leveraging online and cloud-based systems while avoiding major disruptions to daily tasks. We also suspended international and domestic travel for a significant portion of 2020, relying on these same systems to continue our work and local teams’ ability to continue work in the field when sufficiently safe to do so.


Innovations the organization intends to continue permanently after the pandemic:

Most of the changes we conducted during the pandemic, in particular those related to program delivery, have been in response to adverse situations and will not be permanent, as previous modes of working have been optimized through evidence-based iterative processes of improvement over many years. The innovations or changes that have seen positive benefits will require more data to analyze whether we will continue using them. This type of analysis is currently taking place in Kenya by our MLE team to validate the promising results from a pilot we conducted that replaced in-person interviews for coverage validation of our deworming data with remote coverage validation using phone calls. In the preliminary results, the pilot, which was implemented to protect our frontline workers and beneficiaries' communities, showed similar levels of data quality and, if proven to be as robust as the traditional method, could be a more cost-effective way of conducting coverage validation in the future.


...   Impact & Results


This score estimates the actual impact a nonprofit has on the lives of those it serves, and determines whether it is making good use of donor resources to achieve that impact.


Impact & Results Score

100

out of 100

Evidence Action Inc. is highly cost-effective, earning a passing score.


Impact

$0.50 provides clean water to a person for a year.



Back to Top

Impact & Results Report

100

of 100 points


This beta feature is currently viewable only on desktop or tablet screens. Check back later for updates.

Rated Program

Rated Program


Program

Dispensers for Safe Water

Activities

The nonprofit distributes water purification systems to beneficiaries.

Program Type

Water Purification

Beneficiaries Served

People living in poverty

Program Geography

Sub-Saharan Africa

Time Period of Data

1/1/18 to 12/31/18


Learn how we assess the impact of nonprofits

Outcomes and Cost

Outcomes: Changes in the lives of those served by a nonprofit. They can be caused by the nonprofit.

Costs: The money spent by a nonprofit and its partners and beneficiaries.

Impact: Outcome caused by a nonprofit relative to its cost.

Cost-effectiveness: A judgment as to whether the cost was a good use of resources to cause the outcome.


Outcome Metric

A year of clean water provided to a person.


Outcome Data Source

Ratings are based on data the nonprofit itself collects on its work. We use the most recent year with sufficient data. Typically, this data allows us to calculate direct changes in participants' lives, such as increased income.


Output data collected during the program. The nonprofit publicly reports data on how many purifiers it distributes and how many people a purifier serves, which we use to calculate how many person-years of clean water a nonprofit provides.


Method for Attributing Outcomes

We don't know if the observed changes were caused by the nonprofit's program or something else happening at the same time (e.g., a participant got a raise). To determine causation, we take the outcomes we observe and subtract an estimate of the outcomes that would have happened even without the program (i.e., counterfactual outcomes).


We estimate the number of person-years of clean water the nonprofit provides by comparing the person-years actually achieved to the person-years that would have been achieved even in the absence of the nonprofit (the "counterfactual"). Some beneficiaries might have accessed clean water from other providers or on their own; these counterfactual successes must be netted out of the successes we observe. Otherwise, we would be attributing a change in a person's life (gaining clean water) to the nonprofit when it would have happened anyway. Few nonprofits estimate the counterfactual themselves, so we construct our own counterfactual estimate based on research and publicly available data. We research the average rate with which clean water access is increasing year over year in that location, and assume that, if the nonprofit had not intervened, that trend would have continued.


Cost Data Source

After estimating the program's outcomes, we need to determine how much it cost to achieve those outcomes. All monetary costs are counted, whether they are borne by a nonprofit service deliverer or by the nonprofit’s public and private partners.


Program cost data reported by the nonprofit. Partner and beneficiary costs reported by the nonprofit or estimated by Charity Navigator.


Cost Calculation

$4,285,899 program costs + $0 partner costs + $0 beneficiary costs = $4,285,899 total costs


Impact and Determination

We calculate impact, defined as the change in outcomes attributable to a program divided by the cost to achieve those outcomes.

Impact Calculation

$4,285,899 total costs / 9,144,994 person-years of clean water = roughly $0.50 provides clean water to a person for a year.

Benchmark for Rating

Impact & Results scores of water purification programs are based on the cost to provide clean water relative to the market cost that a person incurs to buy water in that country. Programs receive an Impact & Results score of 100 if they provide water for less than 75% of the estimated market costs, and a score of 75 if they do so for less than 125%. If a nonprofit reports impact but doesn't meet the benchmark for cost-effectiveness, it earns a score of 50.

Determination

Highly cost-effective

Nonprofit Comment

Before publishing, we ask every nonprofit we can to review our work, offer corrections and provide a comment.


This nonprofit did not provide a comment

Analysis Details


Analysis conducted in 2019 by ImpactMatters. An analyst searched the Form 990s, annual reports, audited financials and the website of the nonprofit to calculate impact and rate cost-effectiveness. A second analyst conducted quality control.

Additional Information

Unscored

This beta feature is currently viewable only on desktop or tablet screens. Check back later for updates.

Largest Programs

Largest Programs



Evidence Action Inc. reported its three largest programs on its FY 2019 Form 990 as:


$12,720,447

Spent in most recent FY

59%

Percent of program expenses


DEWORM THE WORLD INITIATIVE: EVIDENCE ACTION'S DEWORM THE WORLD INITIATIVE HELPS TO TRANSLATE EVIDENCE INTO WIDESPREAD PRACTICE BY ADVOCATING FOR SCHOOL-BASED DEWORMING TO POLICYMAKERS AND PROVIDING T ... (More)


$4,848,417

Spent in most recent FY

22%

Percent of program expenses


DISPENSERS FOR SAFE WATER PROGRAM: CHLORINE DISPENSERS ARE AN INNOVATIVE, LOW-COST APPROACH PROVEN TO INCREASE RATES OF HOUSEHOLD CHLORINATION OF DRINKING WATER IN RURAL AREAS OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. C ... (More)


$3,718,339

Spent in most recent FY

17%

Percent of program expenses


EVIDENCE ACTION BETA/ACCELERATOR: FOLLOWING A STRATEGIC REVIEW IN 2019, EVIDENCE ACTION BETA WAS RECONSTITUTED AS EVIDENCE ACTION ACCELERATOR WITH A NEW AREA OF FOCUS. CERTAIN ONGOING BETA PROJECTS TH ... (More)


...   Leadership & Adaptability


This score provides an assessment of the organization's leadership capacity, strategic thinking and planning, and ability to innovate or respond to changes in constituent demand/need or other relevant social and economic conditions to achieve the organization's mission.


Leadership & Adaptability Score

100

out of 100

The score earned by Evidence Action Inc. is a passing score.

Encompass Rating V4 provides an evaluation of the organization's Leadership & Adaptability through the nonprofit organization submitting a survey response directly to Charity Navigator.


Back to Top

Leadership & Adaptability Report

100

of 100 points

Mission

The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization’s mission


Evidence Action aims to be a world leader in scaling evidence-based and cost-effective programs to reduce the burden of poverty.


Source: Nonprofit submitted responses

Vision

The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization’s vision.


Evidence Action is building a world where hundreds of millions of people in the poorest places have better opportunities and their lives are measurably improved.


Source: Nonprofit submitted responses

Strategic Goals

The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking and goal setting through sharing their most important strategic goals.


Goal One: Deworm the World: Help governments eliminate intestinal worms as a public health problem among children, and as a result, improving their health, access to education, and livelihoods potential.

Goal Type: Grow, expand, scale or increase access to the existing programs and services.


Goal Two: Dispensers for Safe Water: Deliver free and reliable safe water access to rural communities, reducing diarrheal disease and improving and saving the lives of children under 5.

Goal Type: Grow, expand, scale or increase access to the existing programs and services.


Goal Three: Accelerator: Identify evidence-based interventions with high potential for cost-effective impact and scale those that can measurably improve lives through robust delivery models.

Goal Type: Grow, expand, scale or increase access to the existing programs and services.


Source: Nonprofit submitted responses

Leadership Development

The nonprofit provides evidence of investment in leadership development


Describe an investment in leadership

Evidence Action invests in leadership development opportunities across levels for its staff. Our US-based staff has access to leadership development courses through an external organization called The Management Center, based in Washington DC, and our HR team is researching other local training programs for our employees in the other countries we operate. All US-based staff are encouraged to take a training course called “Working for Change” which helps people define and “own” their workflows, and those in a managerial position receive an additional course in project management and effective leadership. We hold regular meetings for global and regional management teams that discuss key elements of leadership and contribute to skill building.

Source: Nonprofit submitted responses

Mobilizing for Mission

The nonprofit provides evidence of leadership through focusing externally and mobilizing resources for the mission.


This organization mobilizes for mission in the following ways:
  • Strategic Partnerships

  • Networks of Collective Impact Efforts

  • Thought Leadership

  • Raising Awareness

  • Community Building

What are this organization’s external mobilizaton efforts?

Evidence Action’s work is inherently tied to the work of our partners. All of our programs operate in close coordination with national and sub-national governments, either through our role as a technical assistance partner or through direct implementation. In addition, our programs are built on strong community networks, including teachers who are trained to deliver deworming medication to children at school, and community volunteers who educate communities about the importance of using dispensers to ensure their water is safe to drink. We also regularly engage with research institutions to assess the performance and impact of our programs; work closely with other NGOs to advocate for policy interventions; and collaborate with private institutions to increase the impact of our programs. We are committed to sharing and helping others replicate how we translate research and evidence into at-scale impact, by participating in communities of practice, strategic events, and conferences.

Source: Nonprofit submitted responses

Story of Adaptability

The nonprofit has an opportunity to tell the story of how the organization adapted to tremendous external changes in the last year.


During the pandemic, Evidence Action was able to continue program operations and provide additional support to the communities we serve. By leveraging existing resources and relationships, we adapted our program delivery to enable the continuation of high-impact and cost-effective interventions in geographies where such programming is essential for maintaining the health of populations. Our Dispensers for Safe Water program adapted its model to ensure communities had continued access to safe water. In mid-2020, we undertook an emergency response to distribute soap, disinfectant, and hygiene education materials to +67,000 communities with the help of our community-elected volunteers we call promoters. Following initial COVID disruptions, by Oct. 2020 we repaired or replaced +5,000 dispensers and delivered approximately 500,000 liters of chlorine, keeping 27,000 dispensers stocked to provide safe water through Jan. 2021 before returning to normal operations. Our Deworm the World Initiative has worked to support governments in adapting school-based deworming programs in the midst of school closures. In Pakistan, we are working with provincial governments to conduct a new round of deworming treatments beginning July 2021. Following school closures in Kenya, we helped the government restart school-based deworming in early 2021, and successfully prototyped a new method to validate deworming coverage while maintaining social distancing. In Nigeria, we helped the government safely launch a new deworming program in Lagos in May 2021 and are working in other states to restart school-based treatment. In India, we helped the government shift school-based deworming and iron and folic acid supplementation programs to community-based delivery, providing children with continued access to treatment at home. We also used our analytics capabilities to support state governments' COVID-19 response with rapid data analysis, communications materials, and patient and contact tracing.

Source: Nonprofit submitted responses

...   Culture & Community


This score provides an assessment of the organization's engagement with the constituents it serves, a practice we term Constituent Feedback. When organizations listen to constituents, they are able to better deliver on programs and meet the needs of stakeholders. A future version of this Beacon will also assess an organization's people operations and its Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) metrics.


Culture & Community Score

Not Currently Scored

Evidence Action Inc. is currently not eligible for a Culture & Community score because we have not received its Constituent Feedback data. Nonprofit organizations are encouraged to fill out the How We Listen section of their Candid profile. This data will provide the basis for the initial evaluation of Culture & Community.

Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.


Back to Top

Culture & Community Report

Unscored

This beta feature is currently viewable only on desktop or tablet screens. Check back later for updates.

Constituent Feedback

Constituent Feedback


Constituent Feedback and Listening Practice data are not available for this organization. Nonprofit organizations are encouraged to fill out the How We Listen section of their Candid profile. This data will provide the basis for the initial evaluation of Culture & Community.


Charity Navigator believes nonprofit organizations that engage in inclusive practices, such as collecting feedback from the people and communities they serve, may be more effective. We award every nonprofit that completes the Candid survey full credit for this Beacon, in recognition of their willingness to publicly share this information with the nonprofit and philanthropic communities. Although the data is not evaluated for quality at this time, future iterations of this Beacon will include third party or other data that will serve to validate the information provided by the nonprofit.

Analysis and Research


Like the overall Encompass Rating System, the Culture & Community Beacon is designed to evolve as metrics are developed and ready for integration. Our partnership with Feedback Labs and Guidestar by Candid, and other partners including Fund for Shared Insight, GlobalGiving, and Keystone Accountability, enables us to launch the first version of this beacon with Constituent Feedback information collected on Candid's site.


Feedback practices have been shown to support better Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion outcomes, an essential area of assessment that we intend to further expand and develop in the future. Feedback Labs has documented several studies which indicate that beyond achieving organizational goals, nonprofits that are attentive and responsive to concerns and ideas raised by beneficiaries establish stronger relationships with the people they serve, promote greater equity, and empower constituents in ways that can help to ensure better long-term outcomes. You can find resources to help nonprofits improve their feedback practices here.

The Giving Basket had an issue with your donation. Please try again. If the problem persists contact us and include your Cart ID: Unknown