Charity Navigator's ratings previously did not consider Leadership & Adaptability, Culture & Community, or Impact & Measurement. The historic rating mainly reflects a version of today’s Accountability and Finance score. More information on our previous rating methodologies can be found on our rating methodology page.
Rating histories are available for a growing number of rated organizations. Check back later to see if this organization has a rating history!
Wells for Hope for South Sudan, Inc. cannot currently be evaluated by our Accountability & Finance methodology due to only having one year of electronically-filed IRS Form 990 data (990EZ, 990N, 990PF does not qualify).
To ensure year-to-year consistency the Encompass Rating System's Accountability & Finance beacon analyzes the three-year average of some data provided through the IRS form 990.
Charity Navigator currently only has one year of consecutive e-filed Forms 990 from the IRS for Wells for Hope for South Sudan, Inc. under the EIN: 46-4772144.
Before Charity Navigator can evaluate Wells for Hope for South Sudan, Inc., Wells for Hope for South Sudan, Inc. will need to e-file for additional fiscal years.
Revenue and expense data is not available for this organization. This data is only available if this organization has at least one year of electronically-filed Form 990 data filed within the last six years.
Salary of Key Persons - No Data Available
No Data Available
Salary of Key Persons data is currently unavailable for this organization. This data is only available if this charity has at least one year of electronically-filed Form 990 data filed within the last 3 years. In some cases, there may be an electronically-filed 990 on file but the nonprofit may have not included the information and therefore we cannot post it.
IRS Published Data (Business Master File) - Data Available
Organization which receives a substantial part of its support from a governmental unit or the general public 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) (BMF foundation code: 15)
Affiliation:
Independent - the organization is an independent organization or an independent auxiliary (i.e., not affiliated with a National, Regional, or Geographic grouping of organizations). (BMF affiliation code: 3)
Data Sources (IRS Forms 990) - Data Available
The Form 990 is a document that nonprofit organizations file with the IRS annually. We leverage accountability and finance data from it to form Encompass ratings. Click here to search for this organization's Forms 990 on the IRS website (if any are available). Simply enter the organization's name (Wells for Hope for South Sudan, Inc.) or EIN (464772144) in the 'Search Term' field.
Impact & Measurement
Score
82
This beacon estimates the actual impact a charity has on the lives of those it serves, and determines whether it is making good use of donor resources to achieve that impact.
$23,814 total costs / 18,465 person-years of clean water = roughly $1.29 provides a year's worth of safe, reliable access to clean water to a person in need
Program Context
Water Well Drilling in South Sudan: The nonprofit builts water supply systems to increase access to drinking water and provides purification systems to ensure high water quality.
Data Time Period
1/1/23 to 12/31/23
Benchmark for Scoring
Impact scores of water quality & supply programs are based on a WHO estimate of the value of clean drinking water access in developing regions. Programs receive an Impact score of 100 if they provide a person-year of clean water at a cost of less than 75% of the estimated value of water access, and a score of 80 if they do so for less than 125% of the value. If a nonprofit reports impact but doesn't meet the benchmark for cost-effectiveness, it earns a score of 65. The nonprofit's cost to provide clean water is less than 75% of the estimated value of clean water access.
Methodology
This impact score was determined through the Water Quality & Supply methodology which is fully detailed in the Charity Navigator Guide to Ratings. Analysis conducted in 2025 by Charity Navigator using data submitted by the nonprofit, theory and evidence from scientific research studies, and public datasets.
Data Source
The nonprofit submitted cost data along with the number of beneficiaries served in one year, which we use to calculate how many person-years of clean water a nonprofit provides.
Measurement
27 out of 100 points
25% of Impact & Measurement score
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
The Measuring Outcomes assessment evaluates how well a charity tracks progress towards its mission's outcomes.
Displayed below are the responses provided by the charity for the Measuring Outcomes assessment. Each question is designed to address specific criteria, with responses eligible for full, partial, or no credit. Please refer to the scoring rubric for details on how responses are scored.
Selected program: Providing water wells to rural villages in South Sudan, Submitted July 2024
Program Planning and Design
14 out of 21 points
This section assesses the use of crucial evaluation tools in program objective-setting and activities.
Charity leadership uses information collected to make decisions regarding programs
Agree, uses information collected to improve programs
Charity has shared understanding across staff of how programs lead to the goals a program achieves
Agree, has universal understanding of how programs achieve goals
Charity has documents and reviews how program activities lead to change
Disagree, does not document or review
Charity revisits how program activities lead to change
Disagree, does not revisit how program activities lead to change
Program Development
12 out of 28 points
This section assesses the consideration of stakeholders in program objectives and activities.
Charity identifies program target population needs in the following ways
Discussions with local community groups, including local government or other community leaders
Charity considers practical, cultural, and political needs and interests of those served by program
Disagree, did not review the practical, cultural, or political needs of those served
Charity uses SMART Goals
Agree, identified Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound (SMART) goals
Data Collection and Analysis
0 out of 21 points
This section assesses the best practices used in collecting and analyzing program data.
Charity tracks program information in the following ways
Does not track program progress
Charity collects programmatic information on those served by the program in the following ways
Does not collect programmatic information
Charity assesses program effectiveness at multiple points in time
Disagree, does not review any of the information we collect
Reporting and Distribution of Results
0 out of 21 points
This section assesses reporting and disseminating program results.
Charity reports program results to key stakeholders
Does not report results to stakeholders
Charity reports both favorable and unfavorable results
No, charity does not report both favorable and unfavorable results
Use of Results
0 out of 10 points
This section assesses the use of results to guide learning.
Charity uses program results to inform future work for the following reasons
Does not use program results to inform future work
Culture & Community
Not Currently Scored
Wells for Hope for South Sudan, Inc. cannot currently be evaluated by our Culture & Community methodology because we have not received data from the charity regarding its Constituent Feedback.
Note: The absence of a score does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, it only indicates that we have not yet evaluated the organization.
This beacon provides an assessment of the organization's leadership capacity, strategic thinking and planning, and ability to innovate or respond to changes in constituent demand/need or other relevant social and economic conditions to achieve the organization's mission.
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's mission.
We provide clean, accessible water to rural villages near Rumbek, South Sudan by building water wells. These wells save women from making long walks to fetch water for their families, which frees time for childcare. Easier access to clean water also promotes health, allows villagers to irrigate gardens for nutrition as well as commerce, and makes a much needed local health clinic a possibility.
Vision Statement
10 out of 10 points
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking through articulating the organization's vision.
We envision a better life for the rural villagers in the area we serve. It begins with clean and accessible water.
Strategic Goals
20 out of 20 points
The nonprofit organization presents evidence of strategic thinking and goal setting through sharing their most important strategic goals.
Goal One: We want to continue funding and providing wells to villages in the area we serve. We have many requests.
Goal Two: We want to help to establish a much needed medical clinic in the area we serve.
Goal Three: We want to expand our base of supporters and improve fundraising strategy.
Leadership
30 out of 30 points
Full Credit
Partial Credit
No Credit
Investment in Leadership Development
15 out of 15 points
The nonprofit provides evidence of investment in leadership development.
None of the Above
External Focus on Mobilizing Mission
15 out of 15 points
The nonprofit provides evidence of leadership through focusing externally and mobilizing resources for the mission.